Message from @Enigmatic★Chromatic
Discord ID: 505159965510598656
monarchy is globalist now!?
They talk like a boomer
yes but only at the end of its life@Reeves !Musicbot
so you are saying that monarchism itself isn’t globalist, but rather the last monarchs themselves were globalists?
Enlightenment led to Marxism actually. Feudalism lost because of industrialism
they end up being global in the sense of the known world at the time through genetics and the pressures of monarchical relations
feudalism began its decay with colonialism
then they collasp because their genetics become completly shit
The Enlightenment leading to Marxism is true much in the way it lead to Neo Reactionaryism
And colonialism was start of industrialism the main reason to make colonies was to get resources.
To support industries
not that there is anything wrong with imperialism, but it made feudalism mostly obsolete
Aren't y'all partnered with Traditionalism (the server)?
everyone knows the Sahara desert is full of resources
Oh and Feudalism ended in the 1500s when serfdom was made illegal
Which capitalism started to form
Incidents like Paris Commune show otherwise
like who thought marrying their cousin literally thousands of times was a good idea that would actually survive and not end up with a cabal of easily influenced fucking tards that go to war with each other.
ie a global tard family
It would make no sense for people to not capture unproductive parts because it would be a very low cost to acquire them
That's kind of hyperbolic
Monarchism isn’t about the better of the nation but better for the families and their power
That is like saying why would people take a free tissue with dinner
I agree with that Edickens
was the penis cummune really the first cummie realization?
Supposedly yes
Talk in VC about this lads
The Paris Commune was a what spirred the transition from Utopian Socialism to Scientific Socialism
it was pretty shit and the germans just watched lol
And the division between anarchist and communist versions of socialism
Oh and between Reform and Revolution
Marxism however is the current Hegemonic Socialist position, as it's the most thorough, scientific and also has successfully conducted revolution
"scientific"😂
Yes actually, Marxism is much like a science in how it's conducted. I'm not sure I would call it a science in the modern sense so to speak, but it is characteristic of one
It uses much of the methodology and philosophical backing of a science
i understand that well
It is not. The only two theories that are dominant in economics for example, Keynesian and free market, both are different than Marxist economics
Only Marxists says that their view is scientific. No one else does
There is a lot to unpack here
It is simple. Whether you agree that these two are only dominant theories and whether Marxism is different than them
It seems you're more focused on 'winning' than having a conversation