So I can be different. Because that’s what’s important right.

No you just recycle talking points

Everywhere you post shit

Who said anything about capitalism or socialism? I simply pointed out that the world powers that want international laws like carbon taxes aren’t really interested in fighting climate change. That’s a fact. It’s a ruse

It doesn't push a globalist agenda

I mostly post articles with my opinion on its contents.

This is the recycled silliness

I said capitalism because that's what it is

Yes it does. Globalist is an expansion of international law over national law.

It's not globalist rusing

But international law is made by a congregation of those who make national law

That’s just rhetoric I’ve seen people say everywhere. You ever come up with anything original?

What globalist agenda is it to push polluting industries out into the periphery and those industries decide to fuck up the third world for their profit

What globalist agenda does it support

These industries don't benefit the third world at all

They don't bring the third world here

They don’t have to benefit the third world. They don’t even benefit most people in the first. Just the international elites that line their pockets with all this. They push for the expansion of global law because it allows them to exploit everyone everywhere.

It doesn’t even sound like you disagree with me. You’re just being autistic about terminology.

No you're just making up an enemy that doesn't apply

The fact that the industry benefits no one means the alliance of NATIONAL leaders congregate to create the mutual policy of stopping an issue

The fact that developing countries in the outer periphery are not in the alliance of the first world is why the laissez-faire style pollution we see is pushed into the third world

You pulling a boogieman out of a useful verdict by guess who

Not an international boogieman

A collection of national leaders

But they aren’t when it comes to climate change. That alliance we have isn’t doing anything at all. That’s my point. They don’t care, they will never care, and they have no reason to care.

I’m not invoking a boogie man, I’m simply pointing to the groups that are pushing for international environmental laws and noting that they are not effective, and are in fact incentivized to only pretend to do something.

The super rich transcend borders. You make enough money and you have no ties to anyone, anywhere.

So they float around fucking everyone they can .

You are invoking a boogieman by calling it a globalist ruse and a globalist agenda but the reason (and there is carbon reduction by the way) the net carbon emission may just translate to the third world just goes to show these developing countries are to blame and not the international environment laws, as the third world is not part of the alliances of the first world

It renders your point redundant on international law expansion if the third world doesn't listen

The developing countries of the world already have their leaders bought out or democratically elected leaders overthrown (banana republics)

If you Import the few intellectual and economically upper class Africans from another country, After time passes it destroys the African country as they are devoid of those who can innovate and invest. Eventually the poor Africans come in as economic refugees, and then Everything is fucked.

Again you’re fighting me on asinine semantics. If the word globalist triggers you so much pretend like I didn’t use it.

It isn't asinine semantics

It's the entire base of your argument

It's a completely different body of power that is unscrupulous in our arguments if you contrast them

You have different words for the same exact problem and group of people doing the same things.

You are blaming international law and globalists

I'm blaming capitalist corporations and interest groups

who are globalist

They are connected

You have not shown connection but have redundantly tried to polemic international law

Which is a mutual pact of the groups within