I agree rc99g

@هيثم عبدالرحمن I thought u for a social progressive

Even if then one rapes children, I am for execution

Not a based traditional

Or life imprisonment

No I am the most conservative

But no execution for pedophilia?

<:watts:459545655250255903>

If someone rapes a child yes

>oh but she gave consent

Still execution

Below puberty, no sexual consent should be accepted then

Yes

14+ was the traditional start of marriage age for women here

15 and under

But obviously most would not marry til perhaps 16

For numerous reasons

Puberty does not allow consent

Post-puberty teens don't have the capability to understand

The consequences

The brain area responsible for long term decision making doesn't even develop until 25

Well you can't force marriage

No it does not. But if you have 13 year olds trying to hook up for sex like you have now, I would say they or their parents are responsible too

Teens have sex because it feels good in the moment

Not because they fully understand what they are getting into

Pre marital sex should be illegal

@هيثم عبدالرحمن agreed

@Draco it's due in part to unfinished brain development, and impulse

I agree. But I won't put whole responsibility on the rapist. That would literally shield parents or pimps using underage girls

Which happens quite a lot

If a pimp or parent is responsible

Death for both

Especially during specific events

Even past 18, you can't absolutely understand the consequences of sex long term

Your prefrontel cortex isn't finished development until your around 25

Which is responsible for long term decision making and reflection

I want a prudent system in which all parties are afraid to cross boundaries.
That works best.
Putting it only on one gives license to other party to act like a scum.

The post-puberty teen should be put into a correctional facility

For a few months maybe

So the teens don't jailbait

Or deathbait in this case