Message from @Vanguard

Discord ID: 510966670790098944


2018-11-10 23:43:50 UTC  

You ever really read it?

2018-11-10 23:44:06 UTC  

@WAR shut up

2018-11-10 23:44:10 UTC  

read siege faggot

2018-11-10 23:44:17 UTC  

<:OOF:459550070942203924>

2018-11-10 23:45:50 UTC  

So yes, its true. Save rainforests, but don't even try to save "environment" as in "global warming" as long as countries like China don't give a fuck.

2018-11-10 23:46:23 UTC  

China plans to ban all gas cars

2018-11-10 23:46:39 UTC  

China is actually starting to lead in global warming efforts

2018-11-10 23:46:47 UTC  

which is why they are gay

2018-11-10 23:49:15 UTC  

We should focus on Conservation, not environmentalism. But innovation that reduces pollution would be better for western nations than trade caps.

2018-11-10 23:49:27 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452955238186614794/510964237875675137/Screenshot_20181111-004847.jpg

2018-11-10 23:49:39 UTC  

Lol 10 k mton

2018-11-10 23:49:45 UTC  

Sicc

2018-11-10 23:50:35 UTC  

What's up with India WTF

2018-11-10 23:54:15 UTC  

So some of them are red, because this are the country's that will change the least in the next 10 years. Maybe just some % .

2018-11-10 23:56:22 UTC  

the fact india is only 3

2018-11-10 23:56:30 UTC  

is what really suprises me

2018-11-10 23:57:48 UTC  

Anyway, the most important thing of this is not the megatonnes of co2 emissions, it's the science that says even if all these megaton went down a full 95% the net result in globalwarming will only be -0.5 degrees Celsius in total worldwide.

2018-11-10 23:58:13 UTC  

mmmmm

2018-11-10 23:58:23 UTC  

So it's got to be a big money scheme. And that IS where race comes into play .

2018-11-10 23:58:35 UTC  

šŸ˜‰

2018-11-10 23:59:07 UTC  

so its effectively a metric shit ton of carbon dioxide and emmisions for something that seems not that much but can make a big difference over time

2018-11-11 00:01:19 UTC  

Well nature is much more volatile over the years.

2018-11-11 00:02:21 UTC  

But probably yes. In 50.000 years, that 0,5 would matter concerning the ice melting and stuff.

2018-11-11 00:04:56 UTC  

Maybe you can just up the dams 20 cm for a couple million's. Instead of the billions going to the globalwarming communitys.

2018-11-11 07:50:49 UTC  

As an environmentalist, it is pretty obvious that we have to protect the environment. If we don't protect it we will go extint.

2018-11-11 07:51:20 UTC  

You should pin the question of the day

2018-11-11 07:51:34 UTC  

So people can see it even if they missed it

2018-11-11 07:52:21 UTC  

yo I’m sorry I interrupted u

2018-11-11 07:52:25 UTC  

...

2018-11-11 07:52:28 UTC  

slay me

2018-11-11 07:52:29 UTC  

Np

2018-11-11 07:52:38 UTC  

As I was saying

2018-11-11 07:52:54 UTC  

Y'all only care about the labor market and all the conservative shit

2018-11-11 07:53:08 UTC  

Without the environment, there wouldn't be any labor markets

2018-11-11 07:53:56 UTC  

And as long as Earth is going to transform to a new Venus, just because of some idiots who don't even care about the environment

2018-11-11 07:54:11 UTC  

I don't really think there's any chance of saving it

2018-11-11 07:54:56 UTC  

We should try saving it though. As the superior spice on Earth, at the moment, we should try saving our planet.

2018-11-11 07:56:13 UTC  

And the fact that people do not believe that global warming is happening, is as stupid as believing that earth is flat.

2018-11-11 07:57:44 UTC  

Gasses, pollution, ice melting, global warming

2018-11-11 07:58:00 UTC  

And you're talking about labor markets

2018-11-11 07:58:04 UTC  

FOOLS