Message from @ChampionEmperor
Discord ID: 513069146670497835
and their views would lead to an orwellian dystopia
"atleast its not the goberment"
then people can go to websites that don't
which have virtually no viewbase compared to the giant
there are alternatives to youtube twitter etc.
which have virtually no viewbase compared to the giants
doesn't mean they don't exist.
you'd need a mass exodus for it to be even viable
if someone has a broad enough influence
which have fun trying to start
their followers will still find ways to support them
ex: Info wars alex jones
if you're lucky, 1/10 of his supporters will migrate
?
he's still doing good
Giants like youtube need to be regulated
you have an extremely pessimistic point of view
if they dont stop
they're private entities
And?
The constitution should apply to all entities based or operating in the U.S
no
it applies to the governmnet
not private companies
Which is retarded
the internet is too general of a platform to have free speech
no
it's based on the principle of liberty
different programs have different speech laws
@Deleted User Specifically giants
Like youtube
etc
so you mean social media?
e
yes
they're all different companies owned by corporates, they never guaruantee free speech, it's jst appreciated when they do.
Which is why there is 2 options for them
1. Threaten them with regulation unless they fix their act
2. Nationalize them