so thats his "proof"?
thats not even against the fucking theory

He merely says that not every change could be categorized as a whole new phenotype

what a bright discovery, isnt it?

Oh, but he has a paper and you don't.

Strange

His whole idea was basically that not every mutation might lead to a viable/very distinguish phetotypic change, thus the selfish gene theory could not entirely apply to some cases such as above

what

are you dumb

Please write a counter paper

Get it published

And peer reviewed

he generally sums up what many people would agree on, and just proposes that the selfish gene theory might not explain everything

We will wait

im not even denying that man you dumb faggot

Wow. So, you agree with him but do not. Not very bright are you

you call me an atheist and I made one mistake reading but you cant read fucking scientific articles, prove me fucking wrong

I posted a direct statement. You don't want to read that. Because that will break your atheism apart.

I have no time for babies

Write a counter article, get it published and then we will listen to your woes

Deal?

Or you are too much of a fag to do that

im not an atheist you dumb fuck

Oh! Even some theists are retarded

And I have found one

suck my dick and shut up if you will keep on fucking making projections based on your fucking retardation level reaching out of the fucking ape kingdom

Your dad was ape. Bear it. Was he Harambe?

I offer condolences

lads this is so unepic, can we stop?

The author clearly mentioned that the original classification of a GENE is such a unique combination of DNA that results in a new phenotype.
He provided the argument that not every DNA change might result in a new phenotype, because some mutations do not seem to affect it.

@t r u e I dont like the vestigial structure argument, particularly in humans since its simply not true. Generally organisms are perfectly adapted to what they need to do, and i have yet to see a flawed creature, generally evolution allows for perfection in this way.

some genetic changes do not yield clearly visible phenotypic modifications

Lol, still missing the statement that I quoted. Wow, you might have been a baboon. Maybe, we are just different

so what is your fucking issue

what fucking statement

Can you read the statement I quoted?

you posted two fucking links and wrote some crap

Well, you can't.

Ok, baboon

an article isnt a statement

you pathetic piece of shit

Lol. Ok, baboon