Message from @Mr. Wonderful
Discord ID: 520302576189702154
prove a single lie of mine
faggot
Generally citing a paper that has an argument is a method of argumentation bit its moreso arguing by being a carrier pigeon. To disprove his statement based on the paper you must then demosntrate that the paper doesnt support his conclusion or that the paper itself is flawed.
Lol. Read the paper, buddy, the link of which I gave, though evolutionists disagreed
i know a lot of back and forth went and have no idea what conclusions were reached in the end
that I linked it
I made just one mistake when comparing the definition of horizontal gene transfer and normal neo-darwinism, where the horizontal gene transfer includes things beside normal reproduction, but the neo-darwinism doesnt seem to be against any other sort of genetic mutations or "transports" such as for example when using alien plasmids in viruses
ffs
can't we just have both lads
(I like to argue in medicine based on papers, such as finding a ton of research demonstrating that excercise can cure for the most part osteoarthrities, however my hypothesis was my own and the papers were rather considered data so its different)
Lol, you literally don't know what Modern Synthesis is.
@Draco People in sub-Saharan Africa were dying as the result of being infected with malaria by mosquitoes carrying the parasite. There was a point mutation that occurred in the genetic code of the sub-Saharan Africans living around great bodies of water. This point mutation, allowed for them to develop sickle cell anemia, which made them unable to be infected with malaria. As a result, that's single point mutation in the genetic code of sub-Saharan Africans, did not result in the death of those sub-Saharan Africans, it actually resulted in millions of sub-Saharan Africans living as a result of that point mutation that resulted in sickle cell anemia. @|4d|61|74|74|
N 1ggrrs in sub-Saharan Africa
I will rather have blacks than baboons, in my country
tbh
n i g g e r
^^^^^^
N i g g e r s
Well, rather be a n****** than a monkey. Even evolution says so
whats the difference
Well, one might have morals.
@Draco ??????
Well, nothing. Just preparing helis for Evolutionists
ok now this is epic
@Draco literal idiot needs to kill himself
You would be on crucifix for bearing false witness
So, who cares about your retarded opinions
Wonderful, that Draco guy is clearly an uneducated dumb fucking plebeian, but the article that he linked made a viable point that not every mutation can be called selfish as it is the natural "job" of DNA to express, and it could be difficult to decide in between a mutation being "dominant" or not as some do not even provide reliable phenotypic modifications.
The another argument against normal statement of genes being "dominant" is that some cells and other "objects" are more likely to treat DNA as a "pool of material" rather then being directly influenced only by that code.
That you can modify that code "on the fly" as you were for example writing a program that could modify itself.
The example were for example early-stage human body cells that later develop into very specific distinguish cells
You literally contributed nothing to the argument
Well, I didn't lie at the very least
Anything more as I start up the rotors
Also known as stem cells, or hematopoietic, fetal stem cells
<:brainlet:487682295889920016>
One evolutionist deported is one like from God
Lets get to 100k likes
@Mr. Wonderful Thats kind of true, issue is sickle cell anemia wasnt what they hav ethey have the sickle cell trait and express both the sickled erythrocytes and healthy ones allowing them to function asymptomatically until they need to actually do excercise. They often suffer from splenomegaly and other diseases though, peripheral cyanosis and anemia. They arent healthy but they are alive. They are however "defective" compared to their healthy counterparts.
Additionally this wasnt developed in a response to malaria rather due to random enviormental factors and small population size and large families, the trait passed on. Anyone can get the trait anywhere. Most mutations occur randomly.
(random clarification of sickle cell trait not attacking or anything)
anyway, my own argument was that the neo-darwinism theory might be lacking as it wasnt possible to determine every factor to the DNA modification, even that oxford professor mentions it, but his point was to call on the "old" not-updated part of the theory that with current scientific facts might not always make perfect sense.
This is my subjective opinion on it, I think that it was his point.
ah yeah sicle anemia is real