Message from @The Big Oof
Discord ID: 521777810612813824
he survived
and fled to Spain
this was in the 50s
he came back
in the 70s
and served part of another term, and died in the middle of it
30% in real terms
don't believe so
I guess we'll have to get back to each other on this
"
1945-1958: These years are marked by continuity in fiscal policy despite political instability. The combination of industrial protectionism, redistribution of income from an agrarian to industrial production, and growing state intervention in the economy sparks an inflationary process. High trade protection shields domestic industry from external competition and enables a fixed exchange rate.
1959-1965: High inflation prompts a stabilization plan that includes tighter monetary policy, a cut in public expenditures, and increases in taxes and utility prices. Wage growth in the early 1960s pushes prices up. The inflation rate increases faster, and soon real wages fall."
Seems to fall in the 60s
but I'll see if I can find the one I read on the 50s
He wasn't in Argentina in the 60s
he was taken out of power in the 50s
came back in the 70s
His trade protectionism, however
was a failure
No doubt about that
He was expecting a third world war
it made sense at the time
The idea was to make Argentina self sufficient in the event of it
I'm not saying he was the perfect leader, I'm saying that overall, he succeeded. He failed in some areas for sure
Yes his policies
continued to that
The inflation
economic bubble
dude Argentina was one of the most richest before him
Hyperinflation was far worse under Videla's attempts to create a free market economy. Not all of that is attributable to Peron.
Also
he was taken out of power in
55, I think?
came back
in 73
I'm reading some lolbert site and the graph they use even shows the wages going up under his regime, and going down after he was taken out
yeah, I need to validate these sources, but they're all more or less saying the same thing @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ
Videla didn't create a free market economy
or try to
It's the same way people say Hoover was Laisez faire
well, anyway
I may have been presenting the 30% figure unintentionally misleading