Message from @Reb Trump
Discord ID: 530820818087968934
what was the conclusion of that?
did they conclude that it happened?
Uh
I mean, the corpses kinda speak
no
the court
what did it conclude
IIRC, in this incident, the guy said that "If what he did was a crime, then most soldiers would be prosecuted"
lemme find it
you're also
presuming the court is infallible
it's better to presume you're infallible
and not, y'know, biased in favor of the soldiers with guns fighting for lobbied oil interests
So you're saying that if a nation doesn't recognize its own war crimes
everything is ok?
you should be used at the objective beacon then
I'm telling you that you don't have proof that it happened
and even if it did
it's a rogue action
not one the military ordered
or approved of
"Investigators examining the buildings where the killings took place found there was no evidence of a firefight.
Instead they are understood to have concluded that the killings were "methodical in nature" and occurred as the unit conducted a sweep through a town lasting three to five hours.
Among the dead were five men standing near a taxi at a checkpoint and killings inside at least two homes that included women and children, unnamed officials were quoted as saying."
because entire villages were violent toward the US soldiers
Oh
So shooting unarmed civilians who didn't resist
or put up a fight
is ok
'cuz maybe they didn't like the men with guns
that didn't happen
sweeping through their town
uh
eh, I'll just not waste my time
they can not like it as much as they want
if a soldier cannot get around killing that person
then he's killed
america is justified in valueing lives of americans over non-americans
if it didn't, there would be no american lives to value
>implying america cares about the lives of american
your empire is the weirdest empire the sun has ever shine upon
even the Aztec or the Carthaginian with all their human sacrifice were less evil
Are you trolling