Message from @Mahojo
Discord ID: 473944376431607819
Having the 'faith' to keep fighting regardardless of how dire the situation seems is key to survival as is having the SENSE to proceed logically and with caution
Lower end of the bell curve needs more help to exist in modern society
Lower end? A bell curve has two ends
'More dumbells and more nobels'
Describes the physical vs intellectual optimization and trade-offs
Only 24hrs in a days; all things being equal, optimization of one criteria comes at the cost of some other criteria
The iq argument is a proxy for a values discussion... Attempting to avoid it
Having said that... Whites don't need other populations.
Regardless of IQ.... But considering IQ the amount of people below 85 IQ matters to correctly functioning democracy
Having said that... Whites don't need other populations.
Democracy is a Western construct; so that is expected
Expecting ANY population to readily and willing adjust the construct of another will always have suboptimal results
I total agree about IQ being a proxy for a values discussion
I am just not convinced those values cannot be applied to the majority of himan beings give the same boundary conditions/contrasts are present.
collectivism is not inherently leftist
@ManAnimal You don't understand the difference between liberalism and conservatism
They're not mutually exclusive
That's *progressivism* and conservatism, liberalism is nothing to do with it
Let me guess, an all black neighborhood?
https://www.fastcompany.com/90207375/the-worlds-first-high-tech-eco-village-will-reinvent-suburbs
Liberalism is, while accepting that personal freedom is very important, believing that the liberation of people as a whole should be put above in some cases
Right Liberal world order is separate in the poli-sci sense from what people popularly refer to as Liberal
or Libtard
Progressivism is the one that's opposite to conservatism
I'm a conservative, but I'm also a liberal
Yes but you were talking rather intellectually about the term liberal in a *serious* discussion
Dont tell me what i understand; i wasnt talking about either of THOSE conceots; i was talking about a colloquiallism
Stop being a hyper-literal autist
Also, i even contexted 'means TO ME'
I will tell you what you understand if you don't understand something. You were talking about both of them, clearly, 'Liberal's are generally more compassionate and more perceptive. Sometimes these are good qualities. Sometimes they are not.
A liberal's defense is hatred.
A conservative's defense is apathy
Liberals are general feminine in terms if how they process stimulus
Conservatives are generally masculine with regards to how they process stimulus
All things being equal, a libtard will follow their heart off a cliff despite evidence
All things being equal, a conservative will simply give up if the evidence overwhelmingly suggests that a problem has no solution.'
This is clearly you treating them as opposite ends of the field
Don't be spiteful please as well
Yes. Assertions hold. Libtard vs conservative in America
I see you've changed it to libtard
These are NOT the same academicall
Not liberal
No i used LIBTARD ABOVE
THE GUY IN THE ARTICLE USED LIBERAL
You were quoting someone?
His definition is what i would call libtard