or join one

they suck

@Deleted User Yes, that's what democratic socialism is. It's not some sort of radical ideology.

@Milk Yes. If you get 100 normal people in a room and get them to vote on how much someone should get paid, they will choose fairly

@21tagtmeiern Explain what you mean about transition

Thats a load of shit

If you put 100 normal americans its going to be vastly skewed

^

Haha no. They'd talk before the vote about how much they want them to get. Even if it is varied, there'll just be an average.

@Kosaki

there would be violence as workers try to change to democratic socialism

Why would there have to be violence?

@Mahojo A transformation into democratic socialism always requires violence

@Doctor Anon Why tho?

any ideological change that is outside the mainstream requires violence.

Not unless it becomes the mainstream LMAO

It never does

Dem Socialists only get a minority support and then intimidate or use the bandwagon effect to go ""mainstream""

Only a fringe number actually support it

yeah.

hence why violence is required to achieve its goals

however i don't know how you'll get a lot of people on board seeing as most american DemSocs are pretty anti-white and whites make up the largest demographic in the blue-collar working class.

@Mahojo my point is, we've already been shown coops are inferior to normal companies via the free market

If you decide you like the idea, you're free to open your own company or join an existing coop

If anything lowering operating costs like government regulation would proliferate all companies including coops anyways

I will @Deleted User but what I'm saying is that other people should too. Also, what does this sentence mean?, 'If anything lowering operating costs like government regulation would proliferate all companies including coops anyways'

lower taxes = more private enterprise = higher # of coops

ok

Dem Socialists- The Party that manages to be hated by both Rightists and Socialists, amazing!

UnionsTM

@iwantfun just saying the whole south Africa targeting white farmers thing isn’t quite true, South America seized land because they couldn’t afford it and then a white supremacy group faked a list that showed all the “white farms” being targeted despite he list including farms owned by black people, the south African gov is in the wrong for seizure, not for targeting whites

What but that is the point do you not understand contracts or the constitution

I've been wondering about this one thing for like a week or so

What makes dictatorship any different from other kinds of authoritarianism like say absolute monarchy?

(besides the obvious part of monarchy being passed by inheritance and stuff like that)

Literally only the monarchist part

absolute monarchy = dictator monarch

ok

https://www.rt.com/usa/435796-dccc-bots-software-propaganda/ - share. Democrats paying operatives to flag and shut down right wing accounts.

oof

@iwantfun I said they’re on the wrong for seizure, I just the whole targeting whites thing that’s been used as clickbait by the media is misinformation and is merely a stunt of a supremacy group