Message from @Alice Redacted
Discord ID: 483492564649902080
whilst night time stops, wherein race would be difficult to discern, was more equal
citation please
also, nice anecdote
I can tell which race someone is in dark or in light
yes
you also have a harder time picking out what their car looks like
okay, ehre ya go
*here
>ctnewsjunkie
sounds credible
go ahead andtrack down the source, then
No linked sources
It's not my job to find a source backing up your claim, you are responsible for providing the evidence.
What the fuck m8
that's the actual report, btw
ah, no
my bad
yes, yes it was the wrong report
there's a DL link to the full report in that, though
but yeh
as I mentioned
I've got to go
My limited entertainment from this is gone
and I've got a chem lab writeup to complete in a few hours
so
bye
“It is important that these results be viewed as the starting point of a dialogue and not as conclusive evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the officer,”
The report itself says the evidence brought forth isnt conclusive, nor absolute evidence that it is racial bias, because they didnt take into account all variables.
"While the results are worth noting, it should be taken into account the lack of visibility of race also is combined with the lack of visibility of driver error, leading to higher rates of pull overs on minorities, who's driving style is noticeably different to that of whites, which opens the possibility of a police officer making mistakes"
self evident
>im going to post "evidence" and then leave so im automatically right because i wont respond to their counter argument
oh my godddd
fine
last time i'm coming back
just don't fukken @ me
in the former case,it's talking about subconscious bias presumably
Jesus fuck, the subconscious bias bullshit.
haha, yes
What is the point in even talking about it