Or maybe reading the Bible at all.

Myriad examples to contradict call no man father as a literal statement.

If you cherrypicked scripture all day you could come up with plenty of incorrect conclusions, like the rabbi. 😎

Wow, that’s a lot of sheer stupidity to unpack there, but I have a diplomatic appointment

I’ll be back to pick apart that utter tripe later @εïз irma εïз

<:jidf:478767581197500428>

Alright but you'd be flatly wrong.

Otter is the JIDF commander

You have not only displayed poor understanding of Jewish theology but also of your own religion

It's not about Jewish theology.

You claimed rabbis contradict themselves

It's about Christ rejecting subjective interpretations of God and arrogance of those that claim to.

The rabbi is an example.

You have no understanding of how Jewish scriptural interpretation works

Just like with the Civil War issue you're painfully ignorant here.

And the Catholic Church is one of the most hypocritical

Gonna have to pass on another autistic shitfest. Sorry.

Look I don’t have time for this right now

I’ll be back later because you are so fucking dumb and arrogant it hurts my head

Ok. Bye.

I would beat you senseless with a broom handle

Ok.

Fact is, you can disprove me about Jewish theology all you want. I'm quite ignorant about Jewish theology. This is in reference to Christ using rabbis as an example. This is about what Christ said. You're free to educate me on Jewish theology plenty, but that's not what's being discussed at all.

Adios. 🤠

It doesn’t matter what Christ said when the Catholic Church is one of the biggest violators of that precept

Imbecile

Don't attempt to address the original argument at all. That's fine.

This is why I think you're a waste of time.

Fr broski, cya. 🤠

@Alice Redacted women had a higher participation rate in comp sci in the 70s than now

@εïз irma εïз you dumb whore

I told you I would address it seriously later

stop being such a smarmy little cunt

You won't get anywhere avoiding saying anything of substance and insulting me for the millionth time. It's getting old bud.

I feel like you live to talk to me on Discord. It's all you do here almost.

Within seconds of me posting the first thing all day you had your ping ready.

It's flattering, but no thanks.

If you want to not be a troll I'm happy to talk to you.

*It is referring to the propensity for rabbis to perpetuate contradictory doctrines as teachers.*

**Incorrect. Jesus had an issue with PHARISEES not all rabbis. This is exactly why CONTEXT is important as you have said. **

*If we took this literally and completely ignored context we should forbid all use of the word father, ignore the material as an analogy for the spiritual, and reject the fourth commandment.*

**Mostly makes sense, though it reveals your scatterbrained thoughts. I am not sure why you picked the fourth commandment in particular and not all of them?**

*Protfags shallow understanding of theology blows up in their face once again.
The Catholic Church as a preserver of tradition and scripture fulfills that passage, whereas Protestant denominations do the exact opposite.*

**The Catholic Church has not been a preserver of tradition. We can talk about the obvious example of Vatican II. We could go back further even and talk about the Council of Nicea. We could talk about the Gnostic Texts, and the vast differences between early Christianity and Catholicized Christianity. Furthermore, certain Protestant denominations arose to fulfil a more Christ-centred worship instead of the overtly political institution the Church had become during that day and age. Do we need to bring up indulgences for one?**

**Now, that I have gotten the easy critiques out of the way. Let's dig deeper into the passage. The Catholic Church take many liberties in interpreting scripture becoming the a simulacra of the Pharisees that Christ is condemning in this passage. If we look at the Papal decrees over the centuries this should be quite evident to even the casual observer. **

*To quote a great man, sad!
I recommend reading Mark 7:9-13 by the way.
Or maybe reading the Bible at all.
Myriad examples to contradict call no man father as a literal statement.*

**Your pedantic arrogance is on full display here. He obviously was making a joke which you took literally. **

*If you cherrypicked scripture all day you could come up with plenty of incorrect conclusions, like the rabbi*
**Let's use the term Pharisee here, and hopefully agree to use it. Otherwise I will have to break down how Judaism interprets scripture and how this accusation of "cherry-picking" is absolutely false. I would like to see you state that you misspoke here, because otherwise I will take this as an attack on the Jewish religion from an ignorant vapid preening little shiksa**

@εïз irma εïз