Yeah, but that's unrelated to the passage and the original argument.

IT IS NOT UNRELATED

IT'S A REFLECTION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BEING WORTHY OF THOSE SAME CRITICISMS

YOU STUPID DENSE WHORE

I seriously would beat you senseless if I could

Same for the semantic argument of Pharisees. The meaning of the passage is clear from Jesus' standpoint.

Again, I don't get why you get so heated.

YOU USED THE WORD RABBI LIBERALLY

YOU NEVER MENTIONED PHARISEES

I HAD TO CORRECT YOU

STOP CORRECTING YOURSELF AD HOC

SPEAK MORE CLEARLY

Jesus used the word rabbi.

YOU STUPID CUNT

BUT THE CONTEXT IS PHARISEES

HE HAD NO ISSUES WITH SADDUCEES, ETC

Settle down.

No, I won't. You are so fucking dishonest EVERY FUCKING DAY IN HERE

I hardly think it's relevant, again, to the actual argument.

And I am the only one who calls you out on it

IT IS ABSOLUTELY RELEVANT

You are implying that Judaism holds contradictory beliefs

No, I'm referring to what Jesus said.

AND I CORRECTED WHO JESUS EXACTLY WAS REFERRING TO

BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SPEAK WITH CLARITY

How much do you weigh?

Caps lock isn't cruise control for cool.

THIS IS HOW MUCH YOU DISGUST ME

I AM ACTUALLY IN CAPS LOCK NOW

I don't see why my weight is relevant here. You love irrelevant tangents.

because only a fat ugly cunt would have such a shitty personality

Ok.

Ok.

Ok

Ok.

someone muted me

do it again and I leave

@εïз irma εïз You are an arrogant little weasel and absolutely worthless intellectually because you exist only to pad your ego not engage in serious learning

Okay.

@εïз irma εïз Still waiting for you to address my criticisms

I relayed to you reasons that the Catholic Church could be criticised with that same verse you tried to turn back around on Protestants