or hatred

or dislike

which is really telling

whatever ya wanna say

of who you are

Who are your people

the people of the wild

"Or hate or dislike"

why does it have to be that? The debate was about letting them act on their desire

redundant, I know, whatever

So even then

it makes no sense

you brought up hatred, so I kinda assumed that

also, there's been some stuff on legal discrimination in the news where I live recently, so yeh

""Autism is on a spectrum (and mental illness in general). For the sake of argument, the majority of them may not tick all of the boxes, but they do trend in that direction."
See above. If you want to make assumptions based on portions of a community, you could argue white people are more likely to be mass shooters... Or that republicans are less likely to be educated, and so on. Making generalizations based on a minority is dishonest."

"Let's pick and choose facts that go in line with my ideology" is honestly what I just read out of that

but still, you should let 'em act on their desire

Is that what you meant?

It 100% sounds like it

I'm saying

I would never say something like that

Regardless of ideology

you shouldn't dictate your opinions based on the actions of a small minority within a group

You absolutely should

I don't think it's fair to say that all republicans are uneducated

Sure, they are

or all white people are mass shooters

What the hell is going on?

No, they are, go ahead

See, I'm not denying facts

I'm being told to generalize based on a minority of a minority

I'm not either - I'm just not judging people for things they haven't done

First, let's establish something

I want your opinion

At what percentage of a group of people needs to meet x criteria

for

some kind of action to be taken

10% 25%

?

I think you'd need to establish causation in the first place

Let's take causation out of the picture and pretend we have a sample of "R A W D A T A"

You have a Russian minority in your country