Logic can take you anywhere depending on where you start

Also machines crash and we don’t

you can approach the issue in two ways;
a) because the object consists of different parts then it it isnt the same, but then... it is the more object-oriented approach rather than idea-oriented approach.
b) you can define the object as a physical form and then across the time axis observe three-dimensional slices of physical atribbutes of that object changing.
Theoretically, the shape remains the same.

"in taking such an approach, all four-dimensional objects remain numerically identical to themselves while allowing individual time-slices to differ from each other."

it is like imaging a three dimentional field, like... volume that remains the same over the time but consists of different sub-products.

At least this is what I think that they could mean?

Ok so you projected the object to encompass all future possibilities?

How do you know

Before the time event what the configuration would be

I dont understand

So you take time as an axis

How do you know how it plays out before it happens

It only solves the paradox considering you know the future

Backwards

But since we live in real time then it doesn’t tell us nothing

I cant understand your question, but I approach everything in life as a set of attributes tied (as a function) with a specific event in time

there might be many unique objects in the same time, but never the same object belongs to two different *times*
it must be different, it is.

Forward in time a lot of configurations could be possible that comply with the essence of the thing

When I mean a lot I mean infinite in practice

Yes this explanation works if you know what happened

an object such as ship is never the original object outside of the very specific event on the time axis.
The post and pre axis-specified events are always attached to the *same* object that isnt the same as at other points of time.

Thats why I would approach the whole "paradox" as only an object representing a non-physical idea or fulfilling some sort of a x-dimentional field of attributes.

I dont know.

To say a ship in the past was a ship you map all their atoms for all its history

And then you say the object is four dimensional

an object may represent the broad idea of a ship

well, an object is always four dimentional hmm.
Or maybe every object is a three dimensional thing that is attached to the point in time-axis

Ok but the broad idea of a ship is infinite if you try to map it to a physical reality

planks could be made of wood or steel

depends on how broad the idea is

A ship isn’t really the broadest of all

But I would say that there are less and more broad ideas

anyway, the whole point was that the ships are a broad idea, as much as humans are to me

and you might call them the same but they never are

searching for physical attributes of an object makes perfect sense to me

Have to leave now. Nice talking to you

Yeah, I gotta go too. Cya

Hiroshima and Nagasaki had highest Christian numbers. https://www.quora.com/Did-the-atomic-bomb-dropped-on-Nagasaki-wipe-out-a-significant-portion-of-Japanese-Christians

https://richmondunlimited.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/ww-2-the-only-two-christian-cities-in-japan-bombed-with-atomic-bombs/

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2015/11/17/breitbart-news-network-born-in-the-usa-conceived-in-israel/

I wouldn't really call the Theseus problem a "paradox"

it all depends on what the individual considers to be "same"

or "original"

things like these are

human concepts / ideas

i've seen a variant of this problem before, if you slowly replace your entire body with cybernetic parts, one by one, is that still you

etc