there is a reason why the founders tried to keep the legal code short

Not really, if you infringe upon the rights i.e try to pass legislation that would limit a freedom, you are a traitor.

and then someone has to judge

if that happened

and if the person realized

that they were doing that

The bill of rights is above the federal government

someone has to make the judgement

That's what a natural law is, unalienable.

that said person is guilty

establishing that isn't clear

If your law attempts to change the fundamental principles of the nation, it is an act of treason

you can say it all you want

That is clear as it gets.

but the judgement of that

won't be clear

Example

Yo

Do y’all like

Lindt lindor truffles

I dont want a ns state btw

@turdlicka420 yes, but a white and jew are talking

It deadass smells like what this one girl I hooked up withs pussy juice tasted like

With*

I was only speaking hypothetically

you see examples every day when peopel go to court and argue whether their rights have been trampled on, while the other side claims they haven't been

Her pussy tasted like lindr lindor truffles

Stfu a real man’s talking smh @Crazed Shotgun

But anyways

If y’all get any lindt lindor truffles smell the bag

It smells just like a healthy woman’s pussy

Shits delicious

I'm referring to trying to pass legislation that changes the basic foundation of the constitution of said country

I could smell this shit all day

Lindt lindor truffles smells like pussy juice

Fuck it’s so good

2nd Amendment is a prime example of this, and California is the worst perpetrator of changing the law

ok, someone puts in a law

to ban rocket launchers

Shall not be infringed

they can then argue that the code only refers to guns