Subjective experience is not verifiable. That's a huge reason why early psychology was criticized as pseudoscience, because to a large degree it was.

Mhm.

like it's always animals too

Wait, later psychology isn't pseudoscience too? @εïз irma εïз

If you're talking about statistic, that isn't reliable either.

usually wolves, hyenas, or lions

one of those 3

Psychology today relies heavily on biology.

My mom has taken basically every drug for her schizophrenia and **none of them work**

i do like wolves

Yeah

@Deleted User you just told a computer science major that everything was psudo science get out.

And statistics are reliable if they're reliable statistics. 🤔

>computer science major

kek

That's from subjective, personal judgment @εïз irma εïз

Uhhh no. Statistics are not subjective or personal.

TBH insanity is just your "inner vibrative string" vibrating at a different frequencey so you see a different metaphyscal reality in the multiverse, yet you physcally ARENT there

Sure, but I'm talking about reliability

cause everything we see do and percieive is NOT whats actually there

Reliability can not be observed

Yet some statistics are regarded as reliable and some are not.

somehow i DO believe those drugs i took "took me to that hell"

and I wasnt "human" in that realm

Hence the subjectivity of trusting statistics.

like what i say is very controversal

Your position is that statistics CAN be unreliable ergo any field that relies on statistics is pseudoscience? What?

some say is new age

You make no sense.

but... when i talked to others who HAD THE SAME SHIT

at the SAME TIME

somethings up

No?

It's not that statistics can be unreliable, it's that reliability comes from personal judgment. This has nothing to do with the pseudoscience claim.

like? I am a believer in metaphyscal realms outside ours.

Can you tell me by what standards statistics are regarded as reliable or not?

thats why i'm not an atheist

Please go by them, one by one, and tell me how they are subjective.

Statistics more than anything else are raw data.

whos to say those biblical figures

werent fucking crazy people seeing weird shit