For what?

For freedom being good

other than it is natural or is a result of natural trial and error

It's good because it is the only political value which doesn't violate rights

Negative rights*

So what makes the violation of rights wrong?

The fact that the infringement of rights is illegitimate,unethical,immoral and is based in illogical behaviour

Says who

Natural rights are based in logic,to violate them is to be illogical

Why is "logic" what dictates morality?

There is no objective "good" or "bad" in the universe

Then heck off

I want someone's objective justification

<:Dude:459545653031469068>

is that a furry i see

I think so

atheist furry

girls like you have no foundation

I can't imagine a normal human having that picture

You won't get one tho,you want something that can't be obtained

@Obungus it's a joke,long story

i like stories

do tell

I don't care if that objective justification is valid

Just if one exists

in <#452955265961164800> if its too long

or wall of texty

I don't wanna type it all out

ok

join round table

tfw he more tim to talk about retarded morality shit than something actually interstging

TYPICAL

Lol wut?

Sure

@Mrz65

Get in roundtable

**server mutes him**

without a higher ontology

there is no morality

pebble stop

meaning you promote the ability of anything