Message from @CrowGoCaw
Discord ID: 486255123958595594
"both suck" isn't very informative
egalitarianism is the only part of socialism with any merit
>egalitarianism
Egalitarianism is slave morality.
Yes lets ignore all of biology and merit because retards deserve the same vote as 200 IQ mega geniuses
If you can't accept some people are better than others in every way then you deny reality
you can't be better than someone ontologically
and what's wrong with a little slave morality
Because it is resentiment of what makes humans strong and progress, rather than morality based on reality.
When you are by all means more qualified to speak on an issue you deserve the authority to overtake the opinion of someone with zero merit in the subject
sure
That is anti-egalitarian
They have been treated differently
They now have a right or opportunity above the pleb with no knowledge or authority
thats a good thing
well what do you mean by overtake?
I think reducing egalitarianism to everybody has equal merit is disingenuous.
yeah not everyone is equally as good at everything
the doctrine that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities.
Seems like it aims for complete social equality
This is the reason I watch anime.
We need a "Dont know, need more information" option in these polls.
Not gonna lie, I'm pretty ignorant about certain topics.
I just don’t answer the ones I know nothing about
You don’t have to answer every one
Social programs violate private property, turning it into the property of the state. Thus being collectively owned by all and distributed as the state sees fit.
Theoretically the state could tax all your wealth and then redistribute it at will so long as it was legal.
Bernie Sanders even started in one interview he wasn't against 100% taxation
is it racist to have racial preferences for dating?
@O. paxarbolis no but it makes you shallow
@O. paxarbolis no it's a good thing
me: yes, but who tf cares, people are too scared of being called racist
I'm making the case that in practicality there is no distinction @Deleted User
Then refute what I said
karl marx wasn't a fan of social welfare
so ideologically they're completely separate
@Deleted User and state ownership is collective ownership, I already addressed this
i didn't see that explanation
What the state owns is collectively owned by all. The state under their system has the right to tax everything. Meaning that the state theoretically can or does own everything.
yeah well the means of production tax isn't a common thing in social democracies