Message from @campodin
Discord ID: 486291051192254466
No I'm not
<:WhatDid:459545655527079946> <:YouDo:459545654058811392> <:ToMyDrink:459545654323314710>
Why not?
First off, socialism is not wealth distribution. Secondly, wealth distribution is not giving MOP to the people who receive the money in said distribution scheme. Thirdly, you cannot use point #1 to argue that point #2 is socialist for that reason.
If you chose not to read my explanation of this above then I can understand why you're still misunderstanding.
I never claimed the Nordic model was socialist. I claimed social programs are socialist
But the Nordic Model is the biggest example of welfare capitalism.
And i would say it has socialist aspects to it
It's just fiscally realistic because it accepts regressive financial responsibility rather than the incorrect assumption you can just tax the rich and it'll work out for everybody.
Because Nordic Model proponents understand upper classes reinvest most of their money anyways.
The principle of Berniefaggotry and the Nordic Model is the same though.
So what socialist aspects exist exactly?
I already said
This goes back to me pointing out you have strong opinions on stuff you admit you know little about. It's not a great strategy.
How are social programs socialist? They don't transfer the MOP to workers.
I already argued with you about that
They transfer the capital gained from labor gained from the MOP. That's two steps unaccounted for.
but none of your points made sense
no
No, he made the argument that because capital is gained from the MOP that when you have capital you have the MOP.
They aren't interchangeable at all though.
And yes, you do gain capital from MOP.
Just because you didn't say it doesn't mean you didn't mean it, and if you didn't mean it then you didn't understand your own statement.
I'll be right back.
Of course you gain capital from your mop
@Deleted User honestly it is the aesthetic of another server I'm in.
It's a libertarian one
But I do like what he ultimately accomplished in chile
I'm not actually libertarian, just really close to it
Who is Peron?
eva peron is an absolute legend
Was about to say lol
Looks sharp
The only reason I'm not full libertarian, is the cultural aspect.
You can't let your society be free and open to subversion and degeneracy
Lazydaze is more left than me and doesn't have the libtard tag.
I don't think Peron is a fascist by the way.
He didn't have a solid ideological foundation and was simply most partial to fascism.
He is less of a fascist than Franco.
<@&452955176354054172>