Message from @Milk
Discord ID: 486981542569181214
But if we're going to be giving out "gibs" I'd rather it be uniform so that there's no incentive to being a piece of shit loafer
Or just don't "help" people
UBI could be a good temporary solution from the mess of the current one.
Nope
I want none whatso ever, but if it means eliminating a huge branch of government waste, corruption and inefficiency in one fell swoop....
@Milk
If UBI is on net cheaper than the current welfare scheme AND it eliminates the ability for people to game the system then I support it
I dont see how its a worse solution that letting its rotton corpse lumber on.
I would rather the Federal government wasnt involved in welfare, but if they're going to do it either way, I'd prefer the best system of welfare
Yup
How about a solution where the goberment doesn't steal my money
Yea go on then, after you with how you get there.
Alright dude, let's say you're 4 years old and your parents take you to burger king
You can pick something on the menu, or you can go home hungry - there is no going to McDonalds
Or I can eat the food in my house
Yeah, you can say how we SHOULD have gone to McDonalds and I may agree with you
But since the rest of the country insists on going to Burger King, we have to choose something from this menu
You sound like you just read your first book on Austrian economics and want to leap into the promised land instantly. @Milk
No, when I work I earn money
When the goverment takes it I don't earn as much as I should
What do you mean when you work? You mean when you engage in actions which are only rational given the presence of a large defensive apparatus that maintains the system of property rights?
We have a potential plan, to reduce government spending on welfare by lets say... 50% to be conservative. Now, we all want a much higher reduction in the state spending so less of our own money is needed in taxes and we all get richer. BUT you are saying 100% or nothing and wont play the smart game, crying "Wahhh muh morals."
I think you're assuming
Im definitely assuming alot for hyperbolic reasons yes. 😃
@Milk He's saying that if lowering taxes by 100% is good then lowering taxes by 50% should also be a desirable goal.
As a point on the destination to as close to 100% as possible
lets start at 50, then 60 and keep aiming for the magic 100
You are pissing on the idea because it only cuts government size in that sector by 50% and not 100%
hello
p a l s
hello
hello!
RT = Fake News
Get that shit out of here
Error 404 - Page not found
A likely story
Please do not ping for no reason.
just ping odin if you want to ping odin