Message from @JogaFlame
Discord ID: 487116021770092544
eurofags like when someone is a scholar
but they don't care about proof
gay
no u
fuck
Who and why the fuck has a green role
Otter could very well be a furry.
It was not interpreted perfectly
Otter has transcended autism
High IQ
It was a discussion of the blind leading the blind.
oof
I see no reason for you to go off on the idea that the question in it of itself may be incorrect or disorganized in a manner that you don't see fit.
It would appear Lazydaze gave him the role.
and just because the blind can lead the blind in circles does not make it okay.
Lazydaze is otterpilled. I think he was in the right to give him that role.
To better indulge his fantasy.
subjective/objective is an EPISTEMOLOGICAL debate
NOT AN ETHICAL ONE.
Get it through your fucking head @εïз irma εïз
Wait is the high IQ not meant to be a sarcastic joke role
That's only avoiding and prolonging.
You can apply this to questions towards consciousness, religion, and so on.
A yellow bar over a post does not assign it any special significance Otter.
YOU CANNOT ANSWER A QUESTION BASED ON A FLAWED PREMISE
Of course you can't,
THERE'S NO SUBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE DISTINCTION IN ETHICS
that still dosen't mean you can't at least give some feasible answer.
?warn @Deleted User Rule 3
<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***ostentatiousotter#3068 has been warned.***
Useless mods are useless
HOW CAN I NOT BE IN A FIT OF RAGE WHEN EVERYONE IS DEFENDING TOTAL IGNORANCE
You just triggered the most intelligent and cultured man in Europe.
I need to read the rules again lmao
Do you have any idea what you've done?
What Zexy said
He has a PhD br0
They are literally saying it's okay to blissfully ignore that the entire FRAMEWORK OF THE QUESTION is INCORRECT and someone should STILL TRY TO ANSWER IT. NO NO NO NO NO NO
I personally believe that Otter here has perhaps interpreted the question in such a way that it's creating a paradox.