It's just there,

as a answer.

RELATIVISM in ethics typical refers to CULTURAL RELATIVISM

it has nothing to do with utilitarian premises

those ARE UNIVERSAL arguments based on A CONSEQUENTIAL premise

what irma wants to argue for is DEONTOLOGICAL ethics

@Deleted User if you want to emphasize something, use *italics*

Not CAPS

Every post a Ben Shapiro YouTube video title.

which she mislabeled as ***objective***

furthermore, there are many kinds of ***deontological*** arguments

so why did she single out ONE particular form of consequentialism?

Ben Shapiro sodomizes a homeless person with a broken glass bottle

yet she did not single out one particular kind of deontological argument?

all of your obserations are irreleant

the question is wrong on so many levels.

If you fags want a serious argument @Deleted User @εïз irma εïз go to <#452955229227319306> where rule 8 applies

I don't think Otter is capable.

I wouldn't want to humiliate him further.

You've just been utterly humilated

I'm just wondering

I've demonstrated that your question is flawed on every level.

To be fair 90% of the humiliation was your effort. I shouldn't be taking the credit.

if there was literally no sort of link between relativism and ulltiarism

Not even in the slightest?

Whomst the fuck is Mr. Turbofister

hi I'm new here. youre probably already aware but I would like to mention the proposed "raid" that is going to happen on several servers that listed this one as well https://archive.fo/AfVxc#selection-1032.26-1032.27

It reveals that you conflate ethics and epistemology, and you are unaware of ethical categories, and lastly you have no understanding of what relativism means in ethics.

A good name for dwarf characters is Stonechode Hammerfister.

There's ***three*** fundamental problems with your question

If you ever decide to play D&D or anything.

and yet I am the humiliated one here?

I've just exposed you as a charlatan.

This entire situation to me

is a headache.

You can borrow my nom de guerre.

I know qmaps was down all day

The whole sentence is constructed with a deeply embarrassing solecism that reveals someone on the brink of 20 who has developed a ludicrously high opinion of herself while still having failed to master the grammar and vocabulary of her own native language.

We're all very impressed.

In other news

If you rephrase the question correctly, then I'll bestow you with my knowledge of ethics and particular philosophers of interest.