Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 488958364294840320
Of course there is
you are injecting YOUR moral reasoning without explaining it
and assuming the other person identifies with it when he has clearly stated that he doesn't
thirdly that shows that you are not engaging this discussion in good faith
If they were superior then they would dominate the culture, if not they wouldn’t be able to
those two concepts are not bound by logical necessity as you imply
goy, you are outranked here
your IQ is far too low to grapple with me
You attack America culturally and whitewash the Jewish influence on it. Honestly that’s the only source I need that you aren’t in good faith
That’s disingenuousness epitomized
I never "whitewashed" the Jewish influence. You clearly are not reading anything I am writing, and trying to browbeat your narrative onto my words like an amateur blacksmith pounding the metal without heating it to the right temperature
Also, there were three deeply embarrassing contradictions in your claim that do not stand up to logical scrutiny, and furthermore I have counted several solecisms that reveal someone who has reached his early 20s and has a ludicrously high opinion of himself without mastering his native language.
Think carefully about your retort, because you've embarrassed yourself enough for one day
There's no need to spew out all the words right as they reach your tiny hippocampus
You have not once admitted to any negative influence from Jews ever in the West. If you start acknowledging it and thence bring in some nuance then there will be some reason to believe in good faith discussion that we can build from
I have said almost three times now.
That I concede Jews contributed to historical tensions
First time, actually
Wrong.
With me, anyway
I said it three times
Screenshot it
in this discussion
Anyone who was paying attention say it
and if you choose to assume my dishonest then that is on you
I, however, I repeated myself multiple times but your reading comprehension is too poor to follow
Twice you have said you admit it with others, that I’m sure you can see is not an admission of one of my points
You are more interested in your narrative than having a discussion.
You make a poor conversationalist and you are woefully inadequate scholar.
I suggest you pick up a handicraft because you are VERY VERY VERY mentally limited
"You have not once admitted to any negative influence from Jews ever in the West. If you start acknowledging it and thence bring in some nuance then there will be some reason to believe in good faith discussion that we can build from" and this is called "begging the question"
Why would I myself engage in a good faith conversation with a Jew who won’t reciprocate?
I have been attempting to reciprocate several times. My Judaism has nothing to do with our conversation about art history which displayed your ineptitude for everyone to see.
Your admission of Jewish influence has been so limited compared with your endless apologies for them and poor attempts to gaslight
It is YOU who failed to defend his broad strokes.
"admission of Jewish influence"
You are putting words in my mouth.
You are so fixated on begging the question
You cannot just have a discussion about art history without bringing it back to Jews and trying to make me admit to things I did not and have no intention of saying.
You are a man with a motive, and bad at carrying it out