it's not just "masturbatory"

lol. I really should get out of this habit of arguing, before I start work in the morning, with two hours of conversation that go utterly to waste. I mean, do I really need a reminder EVERY MORNING of how utterly nasty, duplicitous and dishonest human beings generally are? But I dunno, there is something fascinating to me about you people keeping a sort of company with one another because I honestly do not understand how it can possibly work. As I say, one or two of you seem, individually, to be fairly decent, intelligent individuals capable of discerning truth from falsity etc. So how the fuck do you continue to take each other seriously as people and derive pleasure from each other's company when you observe each other typing out sentence after sentence that you surely KNOW to be wilful and conscious lies? @Jay1532, for example, can state as an averred truth that I display the qualities of "self loathing, and the propensity to attack then later accept". There is absolutely no evidence that I display either of these qualities. Firstly, I plainly have very high esteem for myself, and for good reason. And secondly: "attack and then later accept"? well, in the first place that doesn't sound like that would be a bad quality, if I possessed it. I mean, being willing to revise one's opinion of someone when one learns better of them is actually a GOOD thing. Unfortunately, it is something I seldom have occasion to do here. I very evidently accept almost NONE of you,. And the reason I don't is precisely because, in your circle, @Jay1532 for example, can come out with the patently false stuff I just outlined and NO ONE CALLS HIM OUT ON IT

U mad

imagine what kind of dimwitted sophomoric brain it takes to keep saying 'u mad' long after it became a dead meme

He mad.

Definitely mad

1) Jews invented monotheism, I think you mean all the philosophers before that, the greeks were even famous for this. Polytheism also has the same monotheistic base of the original creator. Also polytheism does not mean lack of civilization, literally look to any polytheistic empire that existed, Rome being the most obvious.



2) Communists were jews, they were atheistic jews at the same time the bolshevik revolution was a jewish revolution and led to the slaughter of literally millions. Stalin was also I believe married to a jew. Jewish influence in communism and generally relatively recent russian history is undeniable.

3) traditionalism is only alive and well in eastern europe were jews were expelled en mass, there may be other regions as well however thos regions, I am willing to bet, have no jews. I think there is an quite telling demonstration of whats going on. I think Iceland, wheras earlier they had no rabbi, got their first rabbi. The first thing he delcared was that iceland needs diversity. Jews wherever they returned to the ruling class (generally jews do take elite positions by no means of merit, often by subversion of the local people. Polish history is such history and so is Russia, where many of their intellectuals nad artists have written enough about their complicated relationship.) have initiated degeneration through media etc. This is no mystery, the statistics, the actions speak for themselves. (AlexanderKasporov has an excellent video on this, when it comes to advertising and media and who controls that sector.)

4) "read Burke" its like sargons "read Loche", the ideas contained therein, if not explained by you have no meaning to this debate, explain the ideas you mean to reference rather than saying "this book". Its otherwise useless and not productive.

5) EDITED: Terminology even if used wrong, does not discredit an idea. If the conclusion is accurate it is accurate. You also cant simply demand someone to define an entire moral framework rather simply its easier to ask why something is wrong. If the answer is degeneracy, the trivialization fo sex, and reduction of the act to sexual pleasure. Then it is a valid.

6) "I am smart, you are dumb" in fancy words. "I never made the claim, although i did deny all involvement in anything" Lol what, this is dodging the question my dude.

7) Just because a fallacy is present does not mean the conclusion is wrong. Especially when spekaing of history. You cnat discard something merely because of a fallacy the conclusion itself must also be wrong in order for that to happen, otherwise this is simply a fallacy fallacy.

8) Culture does have many facets, however culture is controlled and steered more by media than anything, which is rife with psychology and symbolism. I cna manipulate an entire population of tens of millions, with one 30 second video, and given a team of psychologists and a camera and actors. This is literally what marketing and advertisements do in a primitive yet effective way (hence why companies used this methodology to get women to smoke early on, by manipulating soce

and ye, he mad

@Bogatyr Bogumir your whole entire argument is wrong!!!!!!!!!....based on point 8.

It obviously takes more than one video

true, but say I make a whole propaganda campeign and spread that over as many artistic mediums as possible (art is often a direct expression of culture), then we get well.... effects

usually thats how its done. I wanna get women to smoke, literally advertise smoking to women evrywhere appeal to the feminine, equate smoking with freedom and equality to men etc.

aight that was a nice warm up

time to cram for an exam i have tmorrow and I only have today to study for

Physiology could not be more stressful

Good luck, and I was just mocking the leftist tactic for dismissing legitimate arguments.

"Lel I got you on one small error, now all my slander about you is justified"

lol true, or the use of fallacies as argument "Ha ive caught you in a fallacy, I win, even though i rpovide no reasons as to hwy your conclusion is false HA!"

also Ill post the video that I talk about when speaking of the left, in general, its fascinating to see

If you have never seen soeone who is articulate yet incapable of independant thought, you are about to see one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgsy8p6rcV8

Distributist had a talk with the guy that really demonstrated how bad it was

but he took it down sadly even though the discussion was enlightening as to how these discussions pan out

His talk with liberal sanity project?

I watched it

<:hangthink:487681962505404416>

I haven't watched the jf stream though

Its just as bad, distributist really got to the cor eof the issue though adn didnt let liberal sanity project get away with his tactics, and really pressed down

is there anyone here who has an idea about engineering?

pathetic

you digest your ideas from livestreams

no wonder your retorts had the marks of a con-artist

you are nothing but another preening digital swill merchant trying to stroke his own ego on discord

disgusting... i wish i had an eraser to rub out human filth like you

Interesting pfp you got there frankie boy

@Deleted User are you Jewish

We are borg. you will be assimilated

resistance is futile

@Matty indeed

Hmm