no it would be the same if it said the people or community will secure itself

Well, security is people.

no it isn't

So if you just leave the security force alone.

It'll just behave, right?

If you never think about a problem it just goes away.

Would you remove the law that says farmers can't strike too?

Or be in favour of removing it?

look you are talking about a corrupt institution self policing by doing nothing, I'm talking a group who have an external distorting force performing better without it

I'm not, I'm saying if you just leave something alone it just happens.

Because that's your solution to farmers ails.

Just take the subsidies and leave them alone.

if you leave certain things alone they self correct, yes

So how do you prevent farmers from packing up if it isn't worth it?

I want some farmers to pack up. I think we have too much farming

Okay, but what about the farmers that actually use the subsidies to mark their produce down?

And then they need to either produce more, or they need to charge more.

let them raise the price, perhaps americans will stop eating so much

Okay...

That won't happen, and if the store can import for cheaper...

let them

why not?

Haha.

You're funny.

"Just let domestic farming die if it doesn't work."

it won't die

I know, I was just saying it would suffer.

I don't see why the current farming industry suffering is a bad thing

it is unsustainable

Well you're simultaneously saying it is not their fault, but also saying that they need to take responsibility...

Which is it?

yes, because government currently is taking the responsibility

they need to take responsibility from the government

Okay, but if they go from making 75000, to 50000, and decide it isn't worth it to continue anymore?

75000 is the median salary of farmers and ranchers.

So they don't make a lot of money for what they do.

median.....

Average whatever.

yeah some on the lower end might quit

so what

Well...