Message from @Summī Imperator, 呪い殿
Discord ID: 491837587351404554
yes
Or is it the people?
government doesn't need to do that
government is encouraging them to do that
If I have a family and home I will always go for the more secure income
Well maybe there is a reason they started.
Probably because people started to aggregate in the cities.
Leaving their farms and such.
Aging labour force.
it was started with the idea that we need to keep farmers from being hurt by losss
I think it would be fun to see what happens.
So I'm all for it, honestly.
"Farming will fix itself"
all for what
"Security will secure itself"
That's a quote from our PM
not even remotely similar quotes
When there was a breach in our spy and intelligence agency.
It's the same concept.
Just leave it alone and it will happen
no it would be the same if it said the people or community will secure itself
Well, security is people.
no it isn't
So if you just leave the security force alone.
It'll just behave, right?
If you never think about a problem it just goes away.
Would you remove the law that says farmers can't strike too?
Or be in favour of removing it?
look you are talking about a corrupt institution self policing by doing nothing, I'm talking a group who have an external distorting force performing better without it
I'm not, I'm saying if you just leave something alone it just happens.
Because that's your solution to farmers ails.
Just take the subsidies and leave them alone.
if you leave certain things alone they self correct, yes
So how do you prevent farmers from packing up if it isn't worth it?
I want some farmers to pack up. I think we have too much farming
Okay, but what about the farmers that actually use the subsidies to mark their produce down?
And then they need to either produce more, or they need to charge more.
let them raise the price, perhaps americans will stop eating so much
Okay...
That won't happen, and if the store can import for cheaper...