Generally the idea of brutal mass rapes in the medieval era is way overblown. Sure sometimes there were mass pilalging and rapes, however plundering back then meant running into a house, scaring everyone inside, taking shiny things and leaving.

vilhelm now you're just trolling

then you had the huns and mongols

>overblown
lel

I dont think so

Not at all.

Imagine a man who had been fucking alone for months

dont fucking joke that rape wasnt real

no legit it was veyr overblown.

and is very oerblown. there is a great vid on one chanell of a guy who reads a ton of medieval stuff

Honestly. I havent read medieval sources so I wont speak of it too much

Armies in the past often had caravans of women behind them.

It just is my idea, that being stronger and usually battle-involved they would most likely use the occasions for rape

yeah or sex slaves

like fucking turks

generally raping and truly pillaging was a terrible idea, it simply guaranteed a no mercy policy against you. Not only that in the medieval era the punishment for rape was usually castration while alive, and subsequent death through some horrible method. Women were beyond cherished, mostly because men valued their women and childrne over anything.

yet many barbarians existed

Of course, punishments existed

they did but were they the norm? the vast majority? Hell bandits most certainly stalked the woods or kidnapped girls, they were subsequently gutted alive

I just meant to say that statistically rapes now happen less frequently

due to increased safety

true, i dont disagree with that. My point is mostly that women desire patriarchy regardless of what they say. Hence why assholes prevail and the nice guy always finishes last.

neither option is a good one for her

anyway. I wouldnt say that all feminists were bad. I believe that everyone should have a fair choice and be blamed for their own poor choices

however the asshole is simply more masculine and more probable to let her live her life in a womanly way than the nice guy, who is at best only a decent wallet

Also, there is nothing wrong with a man disciplinary slapping his wife.

Depends

If your wife is a whore and *objectively* needs to be beaten then simply divorce and fuck the thot

if she doesnt deserve it then beating her is just pointless and irrational, also destructive

no point in beating anyone

Women: -slaps man-
Man: -hits back-
Women: RAPE! ASSAULT!

Such a Western attitude.

western attitude?

Violence is perfectly fine in many, many situations.

Would you beat somebody because they failed your expectations? You were the one to chose that person

blame yourself for being an idiot

I mean a bitch slap to calm her down would be nice it works on men too. IT doesnt have to be destructive and brutal. Generally women who cheat, as men who cheat, should be permanently marked

I agree

marked is a good thing imo, but beating isnt neccessary

marry people who arent hysteric morons

Women are like childen in many ways.