Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 518557352744583168


2018-12-01 22:31:57 UTC  

until you dont have the power anymore

2018-12-01 22:32:06 UTC  

same goes with you

2018-12-01 22:32:20 UTC  

@Doctor Anon please tell this faggot to leave me alone

2018-12-01 22:32:33 UTC  

lmao

2018-12-01 22:32:35 UTC  

chadmin is such a dork

2018-12-01 22:32:42 UTC  

probably never touched a woman

2018-12-01 22:32:47 UTC  

so

2018-12-01 22:33:26 UTC  

Hey, At least I dont go to a Jewish private school and is pro-muslim

2018-12-01 22:36:46 UTC  

hello

2018-12-01 22:36:49 UTC  

i am back

2018-12-01 22:37:09 UTC  

@el pebble no woman would let a commie touch them

2018-12-01 22:37:24 UTC  

if only its by force

2018-12-01 22:37:46 UTC  

which is what you dirty slavs do

2018-12-01 22:39:07 UTC  

only virgins hold your opinion

2018-12-01 22:39:12 UTC  

how does it feel

2018-12-01 22:39:15 UTC  

sorry chaim

2018-12-01 22:39:23 UTC  

yeah sure keep saying that

2018-12-01 22:39:30 UTC  

its just a lie

2018-12-01 22:40:59 UTC  

@el pebble just stop talking to him then?

2018-12-01 22:41:36 UTC  

<:Chad:476653434637123584>

2018-12-01 22:41:47 UTC  

Fringe articles? Lmao... even Jewish historians admit that slavery was disproportionately run by the Jews.

New World Jewry, 1483-1825
By Seymour Liebman, Jewish Historian, published by The Jewish Historical Society

“The traffic of slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents of the crown for their sale.”
“[The Jews] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping process was mainly a Jewish enterprise.”
“The ships were not only owned by Jews, but manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.”

Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History
Jewish Historian, Marc Lee Raphael

“Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated”
“This was no less true on the North American mainland; where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in “triangular trade” that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and then converted into Rum for sale in Africa”

2018-12-01 22:42:17 UTC  

there were some jewish slave owners

2018-12-01 22:44:27 UTC  

It was dominated by the Jews, not only white people.

But the Hollywood movies (like those by Spielberg) would love to say that it was purely white.

2018-12-01 22:45:30 UTC  

Ofc the ADL calls everything it disagrees with as an “anti Semitic” canard (lmao).

I bet Jewish historians were involved in an anti Semitic conspiracy too.

2018-12-01 22:46:07 UTC  

They basically discredit the messenger instead of the message, but they can’t do that with Jewish historians.

2018-12-01 22:47:45 UTC  

@Deleted User hollywood is runned by jews

2018-12-01 22:48:00 UTC  

And there is a Jewish agenda behind Hollywood, it’s not only leftist Jews btw

2018-12-01 22:48:05 UTC  

thats why the movie says its only whites

2018-12-01 22:48:14 UTC  

to shift away blame

2018-12-01 22:48:17 UTC  

The same goes for portraying the gangsters in America as mostly Russian

2018-12-01 22:48:40 UTC  

well i cant speak for that

2018-12-01 22:48:53 UTC  

There is no Jewish agenda

2018-12-01 22:49:27 UTC  

```free development of individualities```
"grow or cause to grow and become more mature, advanced, or elaborate."
"start to exist, experience, or possess."

not a perfect word for defining it, should have been stricly defined, as it either starts to exist, or continues to grow or even perhaps continues to develop even further.
The word used in here doesnt precise the concept that the author might be expressing>

"individuality"
"the quality or character of a particular person or thing that distinguishes them from others of the same kind, especially when strongly marked."

it isnt possible to start/intensify a quality such as "difference in between", it is something that either exists as different from another or not.
Apple is as much different from a car as it is different from a cherry. It however can be similar somehow, and in mathematics you can for example create classes of relations, where some object posses the same traits and belong to a specific relation.

So in terms of similarity, one object can posses the same classes as another, that's how people created classification systems and distinguish specific mathematical relations - classes/traits as you wish to call them.

But different things are just different, you cant measure the level if difference. You can measure the level of relative distance, or relative difference in between scalar values.

2018-12-01 22:49:28 UTC  

In objects, it doesnt make ANY sense to ever try calling abstract objects that arent scalar values objects that could have different levels of difference. They arent scalars, they arent vectors. It is like trying to say how much different a foot is from a sun. You cant measure the level of difference in a non-mathematical way.

"The free development of individualities, and hence not the reduction of necessary labour time"
This is an improperly constructed sentence. The existence of something cant point to not existence of something else.
(free development of individualities) => negate (reduction of necessary labour time)

can you achieve the free development of indivdualities AND reduction of necessary labour time at the same time?
Can you spend less work and also differentiate. Well, depends on what exactly is necessary.
However one could for example change their business model and differentiate into two different production lines that would require less resources and also would grant more income thus reduce the amount of necessary labour.

Thus differentiation and reduction of necessary labour would both exist as true.
In this situation author would create a scheme where: true => negate (true) and would call it a general rule.
Implication where a true logical value implicates a false logical value is always false.
The author lies, because his rule has a counter argument.
Dont thank me.

2018-12-01 22:49:32 UTC  

done

2018-12-01 22:50:01 UTC  

you are autistic

2018-12-01 22:50:15 UTC  

You typed all this for no reason

2018-12-01 22:50:16 UTC  

@el pebble you clearly weren’t an anti Semite

2018-12-01 22:50:21 UTC  

I was

2018-12-01 22:50:25 UTC  

Or you were an ignorant one

2018-12-01 22:50:25 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452955220473806859/518559528111964165/image0.jpg