You're introducing a point and then arguing something else

as in unfree

very unfree

Okay, nobody said anything to the contrary?

it is socialism

They are Free for non whites

you did

But as soon as someone is white

They have no rights in Zim

I think you misunderstood what I said

flare clearly you're not understanding the economics

The entire zim economy is Held by Whites

Fucking commies

WHo have no Rights

THEREFORE

nobody is in disagreement that the private property rights are shitty there

ZIMBABWE IS NOT SOCIALIST

THAT IS HERESY TO CLAIM OTHERWISE

It's funny how all people care about is economics

Ugh

yes and it's socialist

muh free market

it;s over economic freedom score is repressed

that is socialist

You're arguing within your definitions and expecting people to define them the exact same way you do

it's circular reasoning

^

Thats the definitions my dude

i blocked him for being retarded

And for not understanding definitions

You're not allowing your definition to be challenged

this is what we call economic illiteracy @Flare

THis is hte Defninition

Idiot

That is the definition

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

In Venezuela:

30 children a day die from diseases such as tuberculosis, polio and measles

68% of children are malnourished

Nearly 300,000 could die by the end of the year due to lack of food

14% of the population has fled since the Socialism was implemented

the definition I use

This is hte internationally accepted English Definition