That's not..
Yes and the same property rights
You're not allowing room for a grey area
is over regulated
do you want me to show you the property rights in Venezeula?
Anarcho-communism is an oxymoron change my mind.
I hate how economics is one a 1-axis
ZIMBABWE IS NOT SOCIALIST
Yes it is
nAzBoL gANg nAzBoL gANgnAzBoL gANgnAzBoL gANg nAzBoL gANgnAzBoL gANg nAzBoL gANgnAzBoL gANgnAzBoL gANg nAzBoL gANgnAzBoL gANgnAzBoL gANg
I proved it to you
this is Venezeula
I DISPROVED THAT
the grey one
What are you trying to prove?
Zimbabwe Has such low Property Rights because they are racist against whites
property rights are repressed
Who own the majority of hte land
You're introducing a point and then arguing something else
as in unfree
very unfree
Okay, nobody said anything to the contrary?
it is socialism
They are Free for non whites
you did
But as soon as someone is white
They have no rights in Zim
I think you misunderstood what I said
flare clearly you're not understanding the economics
The entire zim economy is Held by Whites
Fucking commies
WHo have no Rights
THEREFORE
nobody is in disagreement that the private property rights are shitty there
THAT IS HERESY TO CLAIM OTHERWISE
It's funny how all people care about is economics
Ugh
