And this was the data provided by the ussr again

it was probably lower

Lagging behind western countries and even Asian

no output agrees with that

and these arent sourced

“Nonoutput agrees with that “

What?

there is no measure of output of the soviet union agrees with you

@Bogatyr Bogumir not much help since they didn’t help the citizens who weee living like shit

really ?

That’s not what the chart shows

And the fact that again USSR data was skewered

the soviet citizens engaged in democracy all the time and ate the amount of calories as the US

you are claiming it is skewered with no evidence

And the data from the Soviet Union which was skewed

And how did they engage in democracy (

Democratic centralism

and if you think the CIA would take skewed data from the USSR is silly

yes

Because that’s how they collected the data

you have yet to prove any of this

you have yet to prove any skewing

the authoritarian regimes like Soviet Union or mao China lied about many of their stats

prove everything you said

Because authoritarian regimes lied and had the intention to lie

Just like Cuba

And North Korea

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_Village_(North_Korea)

The data was effectively skewed

you keep saying this

Yes as I said

and basing data validity on your presupposing

aka you cant prove it

bye dork

Because not only is the integrity of the Soviet Union gov terrible. It’s the fact that the state was full of mass propaganda, restriction of freedom of speech to an oppressed level, restriction to movement etc

They had a big reason to lie and due to the shady way they operated “iron curtain” they were most certainly messing up stats

https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol4no3/html/v04i3a01p_0001.htm

all i see are platitudes and not proving

“One of the best examples of Soviet manipulation of data for propaganda purposes was in reporting grain production, when they shifted, for the years 1933-1954, from quantity harvested (barn yield) to the larger figures for the size of the crop in the field (biological yield).”