@Kaiser NO

@Hamtaro

so have you actually read Stirner?

yes?

@Deleted User

responding to the question you had in terms of role

if youre responding yes to to my question

i wass just curious

can i get my roles removed then

since i dont fit well in any of them

ofcource just double click the emoji's

oh right

yeah

there

so what type of stirner fan are you?

anarchist or might makes right hedonist?

it would be outright contradictory to be an egoist anarchist but also an hedonist

stirner spoke against hedonism

how so?

all i read on him was the stanford page

Hedonism externalises your power

so im a bit ignorant on it

stirner was against the imposition of fixed ideas onto the individual

morality, law, blah blah blah

but not only fixed ideas that externalise your power to these false causes but indulging in hedonism does the same thing within the material world

is he against the concept of hedonism or the attachment it creates like an addict's dependency on their drugs?

i guess the latter?

the latter i believe

at an extent, you cant have the latter without the former

i see

you could assert power over the material world without alienating yourself

you have to watch yourself

i see

just like you could utilise fixed ideas like culture and society and private property without being limited or restricted by them

so why would it be against anarchism would be my next question? Most of his literature is usually from the anarchist library

hm?

its not

wait what

no stirner was an anarchist

im an anarchist

oh nvm read it wrong