Message from @TheDesertMerc
Discord ID: 610141677050527785
mind blown, bitch
er wait, wikipedia
that's the site that used to be legit
but since trump won, they (the jews) have given themselves a greenlight to censor the fuck out of the internet
it's their wiki now
to be fair it's very territorial. jews have the entire history section. islam are in charge of their own religion pages
none of this matters of course. what matters is that Jews invented Islam. It's the same religion. same god (saturn)
see i know everything. @everyone. everywhere
Isn't 6 sides & 6 faces duplicitive? Is duplicitive a word?
lol
```The facts on Epstein's prime associates, Trump & Clinton:
1. Clinton was on Epstein's plane known as the "Lolita Express" multiple times
2. Trump was on one of Epstein's planes but not the one known as the Lolita express
3. Clinton was on Epstein's private island
4. Trump is accused by Katie Johnson of being with Epstein and raping her when she was underage girl but she has since dropped her case and none of her claims are verified.
5. A confirmed victim of Epstein , Virginia L. Giuffre, testified that Trump never partook in any of the activities that Epstein partook in.
6. Trump did contact the Attorney that sought to press further charges against Epstein and the attorney spoke positively of him.
7. Epstein helped found the Clinton foundation. ```
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6250478/Giuffre-Exhibits.pdf
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/09/epstein-mar-a-lago-trump-1456221
In the first source, the statements made by Virginia L. Giuffre makes it absolutely clear that Trump and his business, Mar-a-Lago, did not in any way endorse Epstein's actions and court documents instead establish that Mar-a-Lago actually freely provided evidence and information that helped establish a consistent timeline that corresponded to the victim's testimony.
In comparison, Politico's article seems to purposely mislead the reader on the facts concerning this. The very title of the article tried to implicitly lead the reader to the notion that Mar-a-Lago was a well established predatory grounds for Epstein in his pursuit for recruitment of clientele. While the Article makes no easy to discern truth claims in relation to what exact part Mar-a-Lago played in relation to Epstein's underage sex trafficking, it's written in such a way to purposefully induce the idea that there was a positive relationship between Trump's establishment and Epstein's operations.
fb routinely bans me from replying to comments on claims I make. I wonder if that makes them think they won
Does it make you think you won?
I.
Am an amazing dude.
@Heisenberg scrns plz
Excuse you.
<a:tamashake:587046260977172480>
There he is.
Alright so how's this going to go down boss
@Everybody You can fuck off.
<:rinblush:585556516262772737>
Now.
<:sakurabless:585955046194151483>
I agree. What happens when we put laughing gas up Matt Damon's ass.
<a:miyudance:585639065429344257>
Whatever I'm just here to have fun
I thought you knew Matt Damon.
I hired the wrong man.
What's the deal bro what you need done
Oh well.