Message from @GoogleThis
Discord ID: 584472187839316027
Fascism was the only theory in the 20th century to understand power. "When a group or a party is in power it has the obligation of fortifying itself and defending itself against all."
Liberalism is hidden power, Fascism is formalism.
Hidden oligarchs are always more divided and dangerous than formal ones.
Fascism, by formally recognizing the state for what it is, allows for the very virtues liberal democracy strives for (but never seems to reach), that is liberty, and fulfillment of the population
https://www.americanblackshirts.com/single-post/2019/04/08/Force-and-Consent
By Alexander Thomson
Source: The Coming Corporate State
“The Corporate State is based upon industrial and occupational organization, as opposed to the regional or geographical methods of government in place in today’s society. This feature will be common throughout the entire system, both of Government and representation, and must be grasped as an absolute fundamental principle of Corporatism. This idea proposes that the society and economy of a nation should be organized into major interest groups called Corporations that function similarly to a medieval guild system. Workers would be organized along profession and industrial lines, and representatives of those interest groups would settle any problems through negotiation and joint agreement with State oversight. Under corporatism, the labor force and management in an industry belong to an industrial organization such as a guild, syndicate, or corporation. Representatives of the groups are elected into an Assembly of Labor and Management that settles issues through collective negotiation. The duties of these Corporations can be divided into three core categories; the Regulative, Planning, and Social aspects. Each Corporation must regulate the relations between the various factors of production in the industry it controls though negotiation; it must also plan the development of the industry or the closing down of redundant plant by working with the state and various entrepreneurs; finally, it must take heed of the social amenities of those engaged in the industry, their industrial insurance, superannuation, etc.”
Under Corporatism Employers and Employees will be organized into syndicates, each syndicates obtaining each groups elected representatives from their particular industry and occupation. These two syndicates will then be tied together under a central organ titled a “Corporation” -- Hence the name, Corporatism. Within these Corporations, the representatives of both would coordinate economic activity, put terms of labor, set wages and control prices through exercising price regulations. This system as such, can be viewed as one of, if not the most flexible economic systems imaginable. Not only is it capable of limiting economic activity, it's also capable of freeing it when absolutely necessary.
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1306417111
Re-offenders are especially likely to be caught because they’re closely watched, says Jill Levenson, professor of social work at Florida’s Barry University who’s led or participated in at least 10 studies of sex offender recidivism. “I think there are probably fewer undetected offenses by those offenders, especially those under parole or probationary supervision and in treatment” than in the general population, she says.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/pessimism-about-pedophilia
Other public education programs, such as "Stop It Now" (www.stopitnow.org), target bystanders — people who suspect that a child is being sexually abused, but may not know how best to intervene. The preliminary research suggests that such programs may help.
https://psmag.com/news/whats-the-real-rate-of-sex-crime-recidivism
llman contrasts that statement with the numbers from an authoritative 2014 meta-analysis of 21 recidivism studies by a team of leading scholars. It found that 32 percent of sex offenders assessed as a high risk to re-offend did so within 15 years. For offenders judged low risk, the number was 5 percent. And for high-risk offenders who made it 16 years with no re-offenses, their re-offense rate thereafter was zero.
Those low rates seem to show that Kennedy’s number was wrong and puncture the logic of the opinion. But are those the right figures?
https://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html
