so you are agreeing

Doesn't sound like an ideal to me.

that capitalism is driven by material conditons

no capitalism props up reactionary culture (idealism) so people don't become conscious that it is materially driven

Capitalism merely turns people apathetic and distracted by consumerist culture.

I see no ideals here.

Only materialistic lust.

For iPhones or video games.

@Meta They sell the idealist vision of being the person who 'benefits' from capitalism rather than the exploited

someday you will be the businessman!

you will be the one in power!

but you need to buy XYZ product before that can happen

Ah, that's what you mean. That's all capitalist lies.

that 'work hard to get power' spirit in capitalism is idealistic

The only people who get ahead in capitalistic societies are kike-like rodent people.

it doesn't take into consideration the material conditions that the majority of the proleteriat are within

Who are manipulative l.

Capitalism is forced altruism. It is organized chaops. You want something? Give me something for it for your mutual survival. It forces us to be productive in order to survive, it is economic Darwinism, thrive or die

if everyone could be a capitalist 🤔 then who does the work?

im saving that @LoJ that gave me the best laugh

youre a literal kike

@LoJ Shut up, retard.

Capitalism is not Darwinist in any way. Are poor people inferior simply because of having lesser income?

What a materialistic view of life.

People are judged by how much money they hold.

capital

money is often capital but like labor aristocrats exist tbh

I don't like the bourgeois.

movie stars make lots of money

but they don't 'own' the movie industry

the bourgeoisie own it

they don't own the capital

from which they make money from

this is why im careful about using 'capital' rather than 'money'

movie stars are labor aristocrats they make enough to not need to necessarily work

but they still do not own the 'capital' behind them

the power stems from the use of money to obtain capital

Capitalism is Darwinist, for all businesses, they either thrive or they fail. 99% of all businesses fail within the first 5 years of starting up. Where is the Studebaker company today, @Meta ?

@LoJ i disagree you are forgetting that the government can subsidise the capitalist how is that darwinist

the government can **choose winners or losers**

Government involvement is not capitalism, that is mixed market economy