Message from @Huddy
Discord ID: 452903485910941706
@Faust That's the truth
the very thought of human freedom was abhorrent to the Nazis.
@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Bro shut your fucking kike mouth and let the actual humans speak.
How about uhhhhhhhh
**democratically elected monarchs**
:^)
Actual heresy.
That's cancer
<:Brainlet:437295692621545482>
That's absolute cancer
Stopped reading at democratically
<:DabH:382638062661795850>
almost as enlightened as anarcho nationalism
Either a leader is chosen by the Grace of God, or he is chosen by the will of the people.
so just a democratic head of state then
Which is it?
trash
Hereditary divine right of monarchy is the only way
@Faust Leaders are the way they are because they are innately predisposed to be leaders. Any attempt to rationalize this by formulating some system meant to work indefinitely is simply fallacious.
Leaders will rise through their own ability.
This anti-monarchist drivel is anti-Tradition.
anti (((Democratic))) "monarchy"
Death to the Monarchists! Ave to the Autocrat!
Ave! Ave! Ave!
is mandate of heaven the new meta
@Mr. R.K. Moskowien are you a "classical' fascist?
Filthy NEETsocs. Even now, you fail to conjure up any hope or prayer of success, because you have not made an enemy of the modern world.
lmao what?
@When Things Aren't Right Go Left party ideology did not contradict mine
You discard some of the symptoms, but not the disease.
@FreemanTheDemon it's inconsistent with the principles (“Workers of the world, unite”— Marx)
@Faust
Ride the Tiger.
@Mr. R.K. Moskowien Revolt Against the Modern World.
Also you rejected Marx's theory of exploitation
If you actually read what I said, you would know I hold workers above race
Without a Sacred King, your wheel has no axis to turn on.
guys whats your stance on jews?
And I did not reject Marx's theory of exploitation
Show me screenshots and link it to Marx, then I will believe you
@Faust you know, in a democracy, in reality money rules in these countries, they talk about press freedom when in fact all these presses have 1 owner, and the owner in many cases is a sponsor, this press then shapes public opinion, these political parties in those countries aren't different at all like in many countries as of today, you all already know the political parties, they were all the same. then people must think that especially in these countries of freedom and wealth there should exist a very comfortable life for its people, but opposite is the case. in these countries, so called democracies, the people is by no means the main focus of attention, what really matters is the existence of this group of ''democracy makers'', that is, existence of few hundred of giant capitalists who own all the factories and shares and who ultimately lead the people, they are not interested at all in the great mass of people, they are the only ones who can be addressed as international elements because they conduct their buisness everywhere, it is a small rootless international clique that is turning the people against one another. that does not want them to have peace.