what's more likely:
-the claim that has a lot of evidence backing it
or
-the guy who's been making shit up since this started

Good use of occam's razor

mate you literally posted a video of some old russian women saying that she liked stalin after being sent to a gulag, i posted a similar video of holocaust survivors to show you how ridiculous that is to assess the actual history of things lol

>hasn't provided a single source since the debate began
"lefties BTFO"

you provided one guy's account
one that blatantly disagreed with almost every other one

HA

"if i change the topic enough to fit my sources i win the debate"

YOU want to talk about changing the topic?

this started as a debate about homelessness

then we got onto the subject of working conditions

@DA GOMMIE JOO and you failed to provide any evidence that the majority of gulag survivors were pro-soviet lmao

and someone said "what about the USSR?"

i joined in way after that

so we got evidence that the working conditions in the USSR were fine

and then someone said "but they didn't like stalin" just out of nowhere

so now we're debating whether the soviets like stalin

and here you are complaining about one bad piece of evidence

we provided plenty of others

if that's what was being talked about, i apologise

but one piece might be unreliable so it's all a failure

leftists on suicide watch xd

it was my impression that you were talking exclusively about gulag survivors

no
we were discussing working conditions in the USSR

🤔

You posted a video on gulag survivors.

._.

you asked for evidence that the soviets liked stalin

Does he seriously not remember what he was talking about 10 minutes ago?

Hmmm

right-wingers have a special power
they can warp reality with their denial

Also you do know that capitalism in India under the British Rajh starved many 10s of millions right?

i'm unsure who you're talking to

are you still addressing me

no

aight

The autist brigade is really in full force on this server

no kidding

>smash capitalism

>seize the means of production

>intentionally starve your constituents

>when the USSR had better pensions than we do today

Do they think this debunks communism?

every time someone unironically talks about soviet starvation I get a little tankier