anyways a cruical thing about marx the labour theory of value

Lol wut

Austrian school and their theory of marginal utility is shit

was agreed on by economcists of the time

like adam smith

so uhmmm 🤔

@Adoring Fan How is this relevant

We're talking about economics

i wonder what that says about marxist theory 🤔 if adam smith agreed with labour theory of value

it is relevant because your comment has as much bearing on the discussion as yours did

Adam Smith lived prior to Marx

also

not an argument

NoT An ArGuMeNT

>man agreed with it

>therefore it's correct

yes but why did adam smith agree with it?

because LTV makes economic sense

idc, i don't support adam smith's views

>man agrees with x
>why? because x is correct

not

an

argument

but you said there was no economic basis for marxism because marx wasn't an economicist or whatever but when economicist like adam smith agree with things like LTV it shows there is economic basis of marxism

Any economist would tell you his views originated from Smith's views

Smith is a founder of modern economics

adoring

"NOT AN ARGUMENT."

Wait Adam Smith wasn’t even alive when Karl was around

He died in 1790

but his theories literally are based in LTV

But that’s different you said Smith agreed with him

But they both were supporting LTV

I can agree with a minimum wage. And say that we need the minimum wage to be $500/hour. Economists agree with the fact that there should be a minimum wage.

But that does not mean there is an economic basis to my beliefs

therefore

not

an

argument

and i'm off for now

Please just stop saying not an argument