well

free market economics is actually a load of horeshit

and no being a businessman won't allow you to know what the kuznets curve is, for instance

keynesianism

makes

more

sense

than

free market capitalist

economics

idc what makes more sense

that wasn't the topic

well

Nothing worthy was created in economics after Marx

@Advocatus Diaboli nothing worthy was created in Ukraine after the Holodomor

anyways a cruical thing about marx the labour theory of value

Lol wut

Austrian school and their theory of marginal utility is shit

was agreed on by economcists of the time

like adam smith

so uhmmm 🤔

@Adoring Fan How is this relevant

We're talking about economics

i wonder what that says about marxist theory 🤔 if adam smith agreed with labour theory of value

it is relevant because your comment has as much bearing on the discussion as yours did

Adam Smith lived prior to Marx

also

not an argument

NoT An ArGuMeNT

>man agreed with it

>therefore it's correct

yes but why did adam smith agree with it?

because LTV makes economic sense

idc, i don't support adam smith's views

>man agrees with x
>why? because x is correct

not

an

argument

but you said there was no economic basis for marxism because marx wasn't an economicist or whatever but when economicist like adam smith agree with things like LTV it shows there is economic basis of marxism

Any economist would tell you his views originated from Smith's views

Smith is a founder of modern economics