Which means it *is* possible for the majority.

No

I said for a small minority

Are you rejecting what you just said?

"it is a route not impossible for the majority of the proleteriat"

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left capitalism doesnt make sure anything happens
communism would make it so nikola tesla earns the same as a mcdonalds patty flipper

That is the quote.

No you just cant read

it is a route not impossible for the majority of the proleteriat

it is a route not impossible for the majority of the proleteriat

it is a route not impossible for the majority of the proleteriat

Are you blind?

Read it

**majority**

Again

@karbon What?

You think communism means everyone is paid equally?

GG

*majority*

There is a small or tiny minority who can but that doesnt negate the idea that the majority are kept poor by imperialism, neoliberalism, and such

Or else capitalism would not function

no, the bureaucrats managing redistribution would pocket everything

"it is a route not impossible for the majority of the proleteriat"

There is nothing contradictory about what I said.

How is that contradictory

According to Oxfam, 42 people have as much wealth as 3.7 billion of the world's poorest. Just last year, 82% of the global wealth generated trickled upwards into the hands of only 1% of the population. This is not only obscene and utterly reprehensible, it is a grave injustice that can and must be remedied. But in order for radical systemic change to occur, the cucks of the world must refuse to beg like lapdogs before the masters table, hoping to feast on a few scraps here and there. They must take what is rightfully theirs.

^

In one sentence you say the majority *can* possibly, in the next you say the majority *can't.*

i wonder who that 1% is

This is the definition of inconsistency.

🤔

*rubs hands* oy vey

people who cannot afford to reproduce should not reproduce
poverty solved

^

^

or

Nor should we allocate government funding to kill children.

It's not our faults you didn't pull out. >.>

@Perpetual Moral Imbalance but i said a majority cannot while a minority can that is not contradictory at all. If 99% cannot and 1% can then a minority can and a majority cannot.

Nothing contradictory