@AlaJt Das Kapital isn't a great place to start as you can easily become overwhelmed. It's an intellectual force to be reckoned with, that's for sure. I recommend starting off with some introductory texts.

it's a bit boring at first and a decent knowledge of the dialectic is needed going into it

@Mitch Mussolini's doctrine of Fascism and Mein Kampf

Fascism is there to save the bourgeoisie when their influence is falling apart by crushing any actual worker movement. 👍

hmm

Mein Kampf was boring and told me stuff I already knew

mind if i dm some le epic pdfs?

also a few excerpts of Evola

>mein kampf boring

sure, sure.

what translation did you read

reading some of his other economic texts, like wage labor and capital and probably hegel's the philosophy of history is good

Not sure, got it from the library.

tell me

Of course

every man a king

you read a bad translation

read the ford translation @AlaJt

@mcstubbs Yeah, as well as "Value, Price and Profit".

i can dm you it

@mcstubbs I'm pretty sure it has something like that, introductory to the dialectic.

I also have wage-labour and capital and value-price and profit.

gonna send you a few pdfs also you might wanna read meinkampf ford or stalag translation @AlaJt

Marx is wrong when Adam smith agreed with concepts like labour theory of value. Marx is based in material reality smh.

yeah, but it's also good to have some other texts, because marx, although he was a good thinker, was an atrocious writer

@Mitch Is it even worth to read at this point?

yeah

you read a bad translation

I hate reading books on a computer or virtual platform.

the ones in the library are jewd as fuck

But tbh, if you don't have a background in Western Philosophy, particularly German Idealism, you should look into secondary literature first before diving into Hegel directly.

and very dishonest plus they dont give background on some refrences

@🌼Kalina🌹🌸🌹Zay🌹🌸🌹Scott🌼 Haven't got around to finishing Wealth Of Nations

@Mitch I see.

oh yeah, and kant.

but i'm a kant fanboy so i'm biased

No I agree with you.

@WildRooHuntingTutorials same, but i can't get a lot of books in paper

The content of his writings has a well-deserved reputation as dense and formidable, it doesn't help that he wasn't a very good writer. And I say that with love and respect lmao.

the ones i want, anyway

Adam Smith is a critic of capitalism but not a socialist because the concept existed after him :-( Though the Adam Smith Institute is a piss taker