Message from @Adoring Fan
Discord ID: 451450484386168832
I don’t believe it failed because Germany lost the war in its entirety. Also because a system like that can only support itself if the people are all on the same page. One change of thought from one generation to the next and it’s all over
it was only at the end of the war, when they'd been all worned out, that people in the camps started starving
else they were well fed
(((camps)))
well, labor camps at its best
If the economy was that stable, they would have had a much stronger standing during the war.
Kek
they did have strong standing during the war lmao
no dude, supply lanes were bombed hard
it only took the entire rest of the world to win
Yeah let’s force all our people into suffering and call it stable success
>all our people
Wat
>virtually no unemployment, and not akin to the communist "work or you die" model
>highest nominal gdp growth of any country in the world
Well in a rationing economy, it literally is work or you die
there was welfare
so no
it wasn't "literally" work or you die
GDP means nothing in a war if you get demolished
not an argument against the economy
They weren't demolished lol
neither is it an argument against people sufferring
It was pretty bad
Literally conquered most of Europe
They borrowed it
....
What
It means what it means lol
"borrowed it" please
so, the British borrowed most of Africa and India?
if the abbos rise up and retake Australia
will the british have borrowed it too?
Do they still control the land today?
Guys, the Nationalist Chinese only borrowed China.
they conquered most of Europe, it was taken back
Doesn't belong to the Nationalist Chinese.
if I take something from you with force and you take it back
that is not borrowing
your use of language is very inaccurate