*jews

Did Jews have a large influence at one point in the communist movement, particularly after the Jewish Federation of the Socialist Party split? Sure. But they were never a majority. Not in a general membership sense nor in a leadership sense.

And many of them were non-practicing Jews who assimilated.

"it became increasingly apparent to most participants that virtually all of the speakers were Jewish New Yorkers. Speakers with thick New York accents would identify themselves as the "delegate from the Lower East Side" or "the comrade from Brownsville"" - a documented goy communist party member during an interview

it doesn't matter whether a jew practices judaism or not

jews are a people, not a religion

Actually, it's also a religion.

And you're right: just because they were Jews, that inherently means they were connected to the financial aristocracy and therefore rule over all the land.

In Communist cadre, Harvey Klehr estimates the Jewish membership of the CPUSA estimated over 40% of the total membership

The "inferior" Jews are the masters of planet earth, who could easily squash an Ubermensch like yourself.

while not a majority, they were vastly overrepresented

40 to 1

more strawmen

That's exactly what you believe.

You consider them inferior yet all-powerful.

when the communist fails to find reason, which is what is often the case, he resorts to petty illogical nonsense.

is a leech superior to a lion?

is a parasite superior to its inhabitant organism?

I never claim jews are not smart. I claim they are evil

You add parentheses around their name because they are obviously so important.

Keep blaming the Jews for all your problems instead of dealing with real issues. You're a race-reductionist, not an individual seeking systematic change.

keep crying, it is evident you have lost the debate and are resorting to petty illogical nonsense to state your bullshit.

When will you realize that the Jews aren't the problem? Most Jewish people have absolutely nothing to do with the capitalist class and are in a similar position to yourself.

This wasn't a debate, it was you blaming da jooz.

everyone can see your debates, as you so like to analogize, are akin to your excrament

You failed to answer my questions regarding how wealthy and well-informed sympathizers of the Russian Revolution have anything to do with (((them))).

I don't see a problem with that. Why do You?

Holy shit

next you will try vapidly to assert that I'm a homosexual, because your 80 IQ brain hasn't exactly benefited enough from the environment to allow you to go past autistic insults like ur gay lmao.

How did they contribute anything to (((them))) while contributing to the revolution?

watching two ideologies I hate argue is wonderful

(((they))) themselves were the ones who wished for communism to happen

It's like Nazi Germany vs the USSR and I am just America, watching yall kill each other off and come in and take the victory 4th quarter

@Adoring Fan I obviously touched a nerve with that one. Good thing I didn't touch your private place, otherwise you might have had some flashbacks to when Uncledaddy took you camping.

the jewish oil moguls and bankers did not wish to have their own assets seized, which they never did. They wished for their "historical oppressors" to be oppressed

lmao, exactly what I mean

you are incapable of arguing, if your life dependent on it

ad hominem battles inbound!

it's not even an ad hom

it's just an insult

ad hominem debates are fucking great as long as both parties are participating