^

If Stalingrad fell, it would morally wound the USSR,

as it had the name of the leader.

no no

"would the idea of communism exist had it not been funded by marxys bourgeoisie friend?"

you fools

@Adoring Fan people thought stalin was a great leader so wanted statues of him he personally didn't like the cult of personality wtf

it was Proletariatgrad

it exists because there are proletarians fighting for it dickwad

stalin was not a dictator wtf

Was not a dicator lmao

Karde thinks that the people were the dictators.

stalin was way less powerful than bourgeois propaganda thinks he was

the cat is out of the bag

https://i.imgur.com/nUNHm8g.png

"LEADER"

he faced opposition and lost many debates and some decisions made were against his will

thinking stalin controls the entire USA is like thinking the president is in charge of the US

name was pretty irrelevant. more importantly was that taking stalingrad would cut the SU from ~75% of their oil supply

USA?

it is absolutely dumb and shows you understand nothing about the system you're talking about

STALIN CONTROLS THE USA?

._.

Okay dokey.

you should read the constitution of the USSR if you want to really learn about it before spouting garbage

Stalin actually tried to separate the party from the state institutions like Cuba does today

yeah monarchs in Kievan Rus didnt have full control, were they not dictators?

but faced opposition from the central comitee

also he left the central comitee when he took the lead of the state

people put themselves in gulags voluntarily

@Mr.AnalTwister4000 do people put themselves in US prisions voluntarily?

they just wanted to help stalin and shit

they also shot themselves in the back of the head because of retreating

prisions exists because people do crimes

wtf

voluntarily

what country

doesn't

have

prisions?

US prisons are way worse than gulags and thats a fact jack