Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 453127717299421194
they're not sbudued
they're less biologicall capable of gaining strength
so it makes them less strong over their upbringing
no mldk that literally doesn't logically follow
maybe because social constructs can shape over a long time some physical attributions
....
social constructs according to you are like gravity
they aren't
you must think so to follow your logic
it's just that if in agriculture, you always pick strong apples, you'll have only strong apples overtime
and again the entire premise is the scientifically false view that women are equally capable of building strenth
>it's social darwinism
same for dog breeds, it's man made
are you trolling currently?
no
how much levels of low hanging fruit leftist talking points are you on?
just saying a woman that lifts can whoop your balls off
that's literally not what you're saying
i'm saying that the societal role that women are given makes em "weaker" in a physical sense because social construct have an effect on material conditions overtime
MLDK are you sewrious right now? You have a scientifically false premise and have ran with it to go on this whole like lecture where you show basic knowledge in evoanthropology
Marxist theory suggests that any biological difference can be explained because these groups were oppressed into being different, correct?
and a twitter knowledge of social constrcuts
Marx wouldn't say that
but marxist probably would
it's the point of materialist feminism
true, Marx was a based racist nazbol
engels isn't a scientist
nope he wasn't
lol
social science is science dude
deny reality
dney biology
go on tangents
use twitter-tier arguments
are you implying that engels and marx didn't do any research and just stood on their armchair? that's historical dishonesty and proof you didn't glance at their work
I did not
you literally just straw manned me
I don't use twitter tier arguments
yes you do