Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 453126610497830912
that's idiocy
have you ever worked with women?
well yes
technically my best friend is a woman, but she's a gynophile
Women are really good soldiers TBH
women are a social construct
they are as good soldiers or workers as men are
women are not as good workers
because they create drama
well exactly, sexes are biological facts, genders are socially constructed over a very long and slow development since the dawn of society
I want ot abolish women as a gender
How this can ocur is by advancing technology to allow robot breeding
therefore women will be defective men
and die off
genders are just the societal differences made from the economical base that makes women utilitarian to the productivity for the dominant class
wow thanks for the evolutionary anthropology 101
and any deviation from that utilitarian pov is seen as a threat or a moral digression
like "women are feminizing the workplace" or "women are not as strong" etc
women are objectively weaker
so...
no they're biologically less capable
any women that lifts can whoop your ass
this is the problem with a lot of leftist
they act like things are controversial
when the science is settled
no they aren't, they are just subdued to their societal role as "less strong"
Any man that lifts can whoop a woman that lifts' ass
they're not sbudued
they're less biologicall capable of gaining strength
so it makes them less strong over their upbringing
no mldk that literally doesn't logically follow
maybe because social constructs can shape over a long time some physical attributions
....
social constructs according to you are like gravity
they aren't
you must think so to follow your logic
it's just that if in agriculture, you always pick strong apples, you'll have only strong apples overtime
and again the entire premise is the scientifically false view that women are equally capable of building strenth
>it's social darwinism
same for dog breeds, it's man made