Technological progress doesn’t mean someone can’t be a Christian or preserve the nuclear family

Correct

@Mr. X your entire 3 paragraphs should be readily ignored then

You copied it straight from quora

poor information? you literally said that there was no technological progress in the dark ages as your case study to prove me wrong lmfao

And how is it not valid?

Give me an example other than the times when the Catholic Church is involved when Christianity hindered progress

you proved everything in the reminder right

I said it lacked technological progress

How is It valid and his not?

I never said it had none,

Quora is not a reliable source

But incase I did then I was wrong.

No

Read an actual book

@Leroy Because I just proved him wrong. Have you been listening or not?

You proved no one wrong

I've yet to be proven wrong unlike him.

your case study to refute my argument literally proved me right

Yes I have.

No you havent

@McSchlick No.

No it didnt.

That tells us all we need to know

And yes I have.

Using an unreliable quora doesnt prove someone wrong

Prove how the information is unreliable first then Ill talk to you.

Otherwise stop wasting my time.

Quora

>quora

Any autist can act like a professor

Basically

me: "technological advancement inhibits traditionalism"
E: "no it doesn't, in the dark ages there was little technological advancement and so they maintained their traditional values almost wholly"
me: "yes that proves me right thanks"

That doesnt prove that it inhibits traditionalism.

Yes it does

So no it doesnt prove you right.

No it doesnt

ah yes so you just dug up a case study that shows a positive correlation between the two variables i am arguing positively correlate, to prove me wrong

it says that they were traditional, like every standing society.

What else took away century's worth of technological advancement