Message from @McSchlick
Discord ID: 453204461301792778
I dont care if its unreliable.
If you actually think Quora is a reliable source of information I don’t know what to tell you
If its unreliable you must be wrong
Prove to me its unreliable and Ill come back with better sources
If it’s unreliable ur likely wrong
@Mr. X what? the decay of christianity is what i am talking about in terms of technological advancement lol
do you even understand what you're arguing
Why didn’t u use the “more reliable sources” first
*better sources
Now again, unless you're going to prove the point wrong, stop wasting my time.
E is actually a child
^
there is no point talking to this man
"man"
The website is unreliable a lot of the time yes. The source isnt.
Then what is the source
Unless proven otherwise.
Quora?
"Its unreliable most of the time guys"
@gribos I do. Christianity isnt decaying because of technological advancement either.
New points but also wrong.
" but this one isnt trust me"
“Yeah guys it’s wrong most of the time but this time it isn’t” lmao
@McSchlick Okay ad hominem then. You're a conservative so you hate niggers. Because a lot do.
I trust the fact that you know nothing about the dark ages and christianity hindering technological progress
Find better sources my dude
And no I don’t
I just believe we need to conserve some traditional values
*some*
Im not here to convince you. So far you've proven arrogant and too unintelligent to listen to reason. Im merely mocking you by showing proof while you basically just make dumb claims without anything to disprove it.
@Mr. X except traditional christian values *have* decayed with technological advancement. the west is the most technologically developed place on earth, it also has the most number of atheists per capita. same applies to the advance countries in asia. even christians in the west have lost traditional christian values and seek to modernise the bible by pretending that the whole thing is metaphorical, in order to reconcile it with contemporary morality
@McSchlick I dont need to. And because it was an ad hominem attack. Like the one against my source.
You're not convincing with unreliable sources
Your source is unreliable though
It wasn’t an attack
I was stating fact
Especially when you admit the site is unreliable but then go on to say this source isnt because I know I'm right
Like I said you illiterate retard, Im not here to convince you.